Loading...
Loading...
Found 195 Skills
Review a pull request — check diff, run tests, report findings
Systematic workflow for addressing PR review comments using gh-pr-review CLI. Use when the user wants to work through PR review comments and prefers the gh-pr-review tool over helper scripts.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "integrate Gemini review", "merge Gemini suggestions", "add Gemini comments to PR review", "sync Gemini code assist", "combine Gemini feedback", or mentions integrating gemini-code-assist suggestions into the PR review comment. Fetches Gemini Code Assist review comments and integrates non-duplicate, non-outdated suggestions into the pr-review-and-document PR comment.
This skill is used when users request phrases such as 'handle PR review issues', 'fix review items', 'resolve PR feedback', 'process review issues one by one', 'complete review tasks', 'run pr review resolver', 'resolve PR review', 'address review comments', 'fix review findings', or 'handle code review'. It reads the review comments of the PR associated with the current branch, discusses each unresolved issue with the user one by one, lets the user decide on the handling approach, and executes fixes in parallel as background subtasks.
Respond to PR review comments with critical evaluation. Use when addressing code review feedback, responding to bot review comments (Gemini Code Assist, CodeRabbit, etc.), or handling PR suggestions. Fetches comments, evaluates each against project context, applies valid fixes, declines invalid suggestions with reasoning, and posts responses.
Human reviewer self-review for backend PRs — naming, complexity, DB schema, test design, type precision. Use when user says "review my PR", "check my PR", "human review", or wants design/readability feedback. Applies to any TypeScript backend; pair with pr-review-frontend for full-stack PRs.
Perform a thorough quality review of a pull request or feature branch before merging. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review a PR, check if code is production-ready, assess quality, verify docs are updated, or asks "is this ready to merge?", "review this PR", "check quality", "is this production ready?", or similar. Also use when reviewing your own work before submitting.
Generate a single-file interactive HTML code-review artifact for a GitHub PR. Fetches the diff via the gh CLI, performs an honest severity-coded self-review, and renders an artifact with: collapsible per-file diffs with colored inline annotations, severity filter chips, per-finding checkboxes, and a "Create feedback prompt" modal that aggregates the checked items into a paste-ready follow-up prompt ending with "Please address this feedback. Address each individual item in its own conventional commit." Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a pull request visually, asks for an HTML or static review artifact, says "review PR", "review this PR", "build a PR review", wants color-coded findings, feedback aggregation, or a review file they can share — even if they don't explicitly say "HTML". Also trigger on "code review artifact", "interactive review", "feedback prompt for a PR", or when the user mentions reviewing a specific PR number.
Reviews the current local diff or branch at the end of a coding session for high-confidence bugs and repository instruction-file compliance. Use when asked to run `/pr-reviewer` before commit, before push, or before handing changes off for PR creation or update, and when only certain, actionable findings should be reported while style feedback is ignored.
View and manage inline GitHub PR review comments with full thread context from the terminal
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review PR and save results", "run PR review with documentation", "create PR review document", "review and document PR", "save PR review to docs", "document PR review", or mentions reviewing a PR with the intention of saving the review results. Executes comprehensive PR review using pr-review-toolkit with opus model and posts results as a PR comment.
Executes comprehensive PR reviews following Freenet standards. Performs four-perspective review covering code-first analysis, testing, skeptical review, and big-picture assessment.