Loading...
Loading...
Found 207 Skills
Automated PR review and CI auto-fix for GitHub and GitLab using the Composio CLI. Pulls diffs, fetches failing job logs, posts review comments, and loops fix commits until checks go green.
GitHub PR review threads—KEEP/DISCARD triage, replies, KEEP-only code changes, lint/test/push. Open PRs only; not for creating PRs (create-pr-jp).
Review pull requests for the MiniMax Skills repository. Use when reviewing PRs, validating new skill submissions, or checking existing skills for compliance. Run the validation script first for hard checks, then apply quality guidelines for content review. Triggers: PR review, pull request, validate skill, check skill.
Use when reviewing a PR to tractorjuice/arc-kit that adds or extends a community jurisdictional overlay (e.g. au-*, ca-*, uae-*, fr-*, at-*, eu-*, future state-level like au-vic-*) — produces a structured review with blockers, important issues, minor issues, and positive callouts.
Review Argos visual regression builds as one input to a pull request review. Use when a PR has an Argos build link, an Argos status check, or a bot comment pointing to an Argos build, and you need to decide whether the visual diffs match the developer's intent before approving.
Systematic workflow for addressing PR review comments using gh-pr-review CLI. Use when the user wants to work through PR review comments and prefers the gh-pr-review tool over helper scripts.
Pull request and code review with diff-based routing across five dimensions: code quality and guideline compliance, test coverage analysis, silent failure detection, type design and invariant analysis, and comment quality auditing. Classifies changed files and loads only relevant review methodologies. Produces severity-ranked findings (Critical, Important, Suggestion) with confidence scoring. Replaces pr-review-toolkit plugin. Trigger phrases: "review my PR", "review this code", "check my changes", "is this ready to merge", "audit this PR", "review before committing", "check code quality", "any issues with this code", "pre-merge review", "look over my changes", "code review". Use this skill when reviewing code before commit or merge, checking PR quality, or when the user asks for feedback on recent modifications.
Review a GitHub Pull Request as a responsible project owner using the `gh` CLI. Use when the user provides a PR URL (e.g. https://github.com/ORG/REPO/pull/N) or a PR number for the current git repo (prefer upstream, else origin) and wants an owner-grade review document `review-N.md` written in Chinese with copy-pastable GitHub comments in English. Scope the review to lines changed by the PR (do not nitpick unrelated pre-existing code), but apply best practices and flag any clear bugs, security issues, or CI failures caused by the change.
Security-first PR review checklist for this repo. Use when reviewing diffs/PRs, especially changes involving auth, networking, sensitive data, or dependency/lockfile updates. Focus on secret/PII leakage risk, supply-chain risk (npm + node_modules inspection), cross-platform architecture (extension/mobile/desktop/web), and React performance (hooks + re-render hotspots). Avoid UI style nitpicks. PR Review.
Review a pull request — check diff, run tests, report findings
Conduct Pull Request code reviews, including comprehensive evaluations of code quality, security, performance, architectural rationality, etc. Activated when users request PR reviews or mention keywords like "review pr", "check PR", etc.
Executes comprehensive PR reviews following Freenet standards. Performs four-perspective review covering code-first analysis, testing, skeptical review, and big-picture assessment.