Loading...
Loading...
Found 17 Skills
Studies exemplar papers from a target venue and produces an original style-and-structure brief — fetches best-paper awardees and top-cited papers on demand (DBLP, Semantic Scholar, Unpaywall, arXiv, open-access ACM DL) and analyzes section architecture, contribution framing, evaluation patterns, and figure/table conventions. Use when the user wants to study best papers or award-winning papers at a venue, find the most-cited papers and how they are structured, learn how successful papers at a conference are written ("what do winning SIGSPATIAL papers look like", "analyze NeurIPS best papers before I draft"), or model a draft on a venue's strongest work. Copyright-safe by design - papers are fetched from legal open-access sources and processed transiently, never bundled, stored, or committed; the output is metadata plus original analysis. Trigger words - exemplar, best paper, award-winning, most cited, top cited, model paper, venue style, paper structure.
Paper Analyst — Responsible for in-depth paper reading, extracting method details, and building comparison tables. Activated when assigned to analyze papers by research supervisors or literature investigators. Conduct structured analysis on the Top 20 core papers, generate paper analysis cards and cross-paper comparison tables.
Help a reader understand, evaluate, and use research papers, especially in science, engineering, mathematics, and computing. Use for a paper walkthrough, an unfamiliar method or result, a relevance assessment, or a comparison of papers. Adapt to the reader's knowledge and purpose, explain the core argument from first principles, and connect claims to evidence. Accept files, links, identifiers, or excerpts; a PDF upload is not required.
Interrogate an academic paper that makes or informs a causal claim, explain what effect it identifies and for whom, stress-test where it may fail, and derive proportionate public or policy advice. Use for causal paper analysis; use ordinary summarisation when no causal interpretation or recommendation is requested.
Read one supplied paper closely enough to reconstruct how its authors actually got there, rather than restating what the abstract claims. Use for 精读论文, 讲透这篇论文, 把这篇读懂, 作者为什么这么设计, 这个公式怎么推出来的, paper x-ray, and deep single-paper comprehension before building on, reviewing, presenting, or citing that paper. Recovers the real starting point and the bet the authors placed, separates load-bearing design from decoration, grounds each key formula in a worked micro-example with concrete numbers, and checks how far the evidence actually reaches, including where the authors are confident and where the paper does not report something. Delivers a structured Markdown long-read by default. Not a summary, not a translation, not a peer review.