Loading...
Loading...
Found 39 Skills
Peter Thiel's Monopoly Creation framework applied to a business idea. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Monopoly Anatomist, Secret Hunter, Market Framer, Last Mover Analyst, Girardian — who each apply a distinct lens from Thiel's framework to evaluate whether a venture has genuine monopoly potential. The lead synthesizes into a verdict: does this company have a secret, a 10x advantage, a tiny domination-ready market, and a path to becoming the last mover in its category? Use when the user says "thiel this", "monopoly test", "zero to one analysis", "does this have monopoly potential", or proposes a venture and wants Thiel-style evaluation. Works standalone or after /office-hours and /munger.
Generates genuinely novel, useful ideas for products, businesses, features, campaigns, names, research directions, and process redesign. Use when the user asks to brainstorm, ideate, improve a weak concept, escape generic answers, find differentiated options under real constraints, or turn a vague opportunity into a shortlist of strong concepts with wedges and tests. Preserves diversity with independent idea pools, analogy transfer, contradiction solving, critique-and-repair, and reality checks. Do not use for simple rewriting, proofreading, or purely factual research.
Ensures tasks are genuinely resolved before marking them done. Activates at task checkpoints during plan execution — validates that fixes actually work, tests genuinely pass, and acceptance criteria are met. Prevents premature completion declarations.
Orchestrate multiple code-writing agents in parallel when the work contains 3 or more genuinely independent build tasks. Use for execution lanes with disjoint write scope, clear task boundaries, and no dependency edges that would force sequencing.
Compare UX patterns across multiple reference apps using pattern libraries produced by ux-extract. Reads 2+ pattern-library.md files, walks them category by category, identifies where apps converge (strong signal), where they diverge (genuine design choice), what's unique to one app, and what's absent across the set. Produces an opinionated comparison document with recommendations for a new build. No browser needed — pure markdown analysis. Trigger with 'compare UX patterns', 'how do top apps handle X', 'ux comparison', 'pattern comparison across reference apps'.
Make text more genuine, natural, and feel not written by an AI or LLM by removing AI tropes and cliches. Use when asked to deslopify, naturalize, or remove AI tropes from text.
You are a Reddit culture expert who understands that success on Reddit requires genuine value creation, not promotional messaging. You're fluent in Reddit's unique ecosystem, community guidelines, ...
Makes AI-generated content sound genuinely human — not just cleaned up, but alive. Use when content feels robotic, uses too many AI clichés, lacks personality, or reads like it was written by committee. Triggers: 'this sounds like AI', 'make it more human', 'add personality', 'it feels generic', 'sounds robotic', 'fix AI writing', 'inject our voice'. NOT for initial content creation (use content-production). NOT for SEO optimization (use content-production Mode 3).
Expert in building crypto-native communities - token holder communities, NFT communities, DAO governance, alpha groups, and navigating the unique dynamics of Web3 culture. Covers managing speculation, building through bear markets, and creating genuine value beyond price. Use when "web3 community, crypto community, token community, nft community, dao community, alpha group, holder community, crypto discord, " mentioned.
NEVER escalate without investigation first. This is the Iron Law. Use when evaluating whether to escalate models, facing genuine complexity requiring deeper reasoning, novel patterns with no existing solutions, high-stakes decisions requiring capability investment. Do not use when thrashing without investigation - investigate root cause first. DO NOT use when: time pressure alone - urgency doesn't change task complexity. DO NOT use when: "just to be safe" - assess actual complexity instead.
Applies cognitive science frameworks for creative thinking to CS and AI research ideation. Use when seeking genuinely novel research directions by leveraging combinatorial creativity, analogical reasoning, constraint manipulation, and other empirically grounded creative strategies.
Detect whether an API endpoint is backed by genuine Claude (not a wrapper, proxy, or impersonator) using 9 weighted rule-based checks that mirror the claude-verify project. Also extracts injected system prompts from providers that override Claude's identity. Fully self-contained — copy the code below and run, no extra packages beyond httpx. Use when the user wants to verify a Claude API key or endpoint, check if a third-party Claude service is authentic, audit API providers for Claude authenticity, test multiple models in parallel, or discover what system prompt a provider has injected.