Loading...
Loading...
Found 24 Skills
Document the finalized tech stack selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent records. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four categories: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively trigger after making important choices during feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record the decision", "archive tech selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive proposed solutions under discussion.
Draft or update requirement documents under `codestable/requirements/` for the project — use **user stories + plain language** to describe a capability's "reason for existence, solution approach, and boundaries", so non-technical readers can quickly understand the highlights of the system. Layered with architecture: requirement is the "problem space" (why this capability is needed), while architecture is the "solution space" (what structure is used to implement it). Two modes: new (draft a new requirement doc from scratch), update (refresh an existing doc based on new materials or implementation changes). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: the user says "fill in a requirement doc", "write down the requirements for this capability", "update the requirements directory", or during the feature-design phase, it is found that there is no corresponding requirement for the capability to be implemented this time.
Structured specification with explicit scope boundaries: user stories, acceptance criteria, out-of-scope definition, risks, and estimation. Positions before feature-design in the feature lifecycle pipeline. Use when: "write spec", "user stories", "define requirements", "scope this", "what should this do", "acceptance criteria", "define scope"
Resolve implementation ambiguities before planning begins. Two modes: Discussion mode surfaces gray areas with concrete options for greenfield work. Assumptions mode reads the codebase, forms evidence-based opinions, and asks the user to correct only what's wrong (brownfield work). Use for "discuss ambiguities", "resolve gray areas", "clarify before planning", "assumptions mode", "what are the gray areas", "before we plan". Do NOT use for broad design exploration (use feature-design) or for planning itself (use feature-plan).
Break a design document into wave-ordered implementation tasks with domain agent assignments. Use after /feature-design produces a design doc. Use for "plan feature", "break down design", "create tasks", or "/feature-plan". Do NOT use without a design doc or for simple single-task work.
Document finalized technology selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent documents. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four types: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively push when important choices are made after feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record decision", "archive technology selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive under-discussion solutions.
This skill should be used when a designer wants to produce a holistic design for a full feature before it is broken into tasks — for example "design feature
architecture design system planning structure pattern integration features
Phase 1 of the feature workflow — Draft a design document for the new feature, serving as the sole input for subsequent implementation and acceptance. First gather evidence (read architecture docs, review relevant code, grep to prevent term conflicts, check archives), then write a complete first draft in one go (including YAML frontmatter + three-tier structure + test design), submit it to the user for overall review, and iterate until approval. After approval, extract {slug}-checklist.yaml from {slug}-design.md for use in the next two phases. Trigger scenarios: "Start designing the solution", "Write design doc", "Prepare to implement XX", with the prerequisite that you already know what to do, who it's for, and how to define success.
Use this skill when brainstorming, designing, or planning any Swift feature. This is the right skill whenever the user describes a feature they want to build, asks "how should I implement X", wants to think through a design, or starts with something like "I want to add..." or "let's plan...". Use it even if they don't explicitly say "brainstorm" — if there's a feature to figure out, start here before touching any code.
2. Create Feature Design Document
New Feature Design Exploration Process. Used when users have vague ideas for new features or modules. Through the structured process of "Requirements Convergence → Technical Research → ASCII Batch Exploration → HTML Design Draft → Full State Coverage → Requirements Summary", deliverable design reference documents are generated from vague ideas, serving as input for the PRD phase.