Loading...
Loading...
Found 38 Skills
Design a provider-side outbound webhook platform - event taxonomy and catalog, payload envelope and schema versioning, an HMAC signing scheme (Standard Webhooks), at-least-once delivery with retry/backoff and dead-letter policy, subscription lifecycle states, and the developer-facing debugging surface (delivery logs, replay, test-event triggering). Use whenever the user mentions webhooks, event callbacks, push events to customer endpoints, webhook signatures, delivery retries, or a webhook consumer portal - even if they never say "webhook platform". Provider side only. Do NOT use for consumer-side retry mechanics - use samber/developer-platform-skills@api-idempotency-retry instead.
Decide which integration surfaces a platform offers external developers and AI agents - REST, GraphQL, gRPC, SQL access, bulk data sharing, webhooks, SDKs, CLI, MCP, embedded components - and in what build order, sequenced by reversal cost and audience rather than novelty. Use whenever the user mentions which API to build first, adding a GraphQL or MCP layer, an integration-surface roadmap, API-first vs embedded-first, or a missing surface blocking deals - even if they never say "integration surface". Umbrella strategy only - once a surface is chosen, per-surface design belongs to siblings such as samber/developer-platform-skills@webhook-platform-design and samber/developer-platform-skills@sdk-portfolio-strategy.
Before starting any developer-platform, public-API, or integration work - or whenever no other platform skill has been chosen - route the task to the right skill in samber/developer-platform-skills, or say plainly that none fits, then bootstrap or resume the project's shared platform context. Fires at every API or platform project start, at each recurring platform review, and whenever routing is unclear. Use whenever the user mentions a developer platform kickoff, a new public API program, an integration-surface roadmap, "which platform skill do I need", "where do I start with our public API", platform skill routing, or a recurring platform check-in - even if they never name a skill or ask to be routed. It spans REST, GraphQL and gRPC design, webhooks, SDKs, MCP, OAuth and API keys, rate limits, versioning, developer portals, docs, sandboxes, marketplaces, and partner strategy, so an ambiguous platform question belongs here first. Outputs a short-list and an ordered skill chain, never the design itself.
Employer-side hiring for developer-platform roles - API Product Manager, Platform Engineer/Architect, Partner/Integration Engineer. Disambiguates "platform engineer" first, since the term overwhelmingly means internal developer platforms elsewhere in the industry. Calibrates the scorecard to company archetype (infra/API-first, bolt-on public API, enterprise partner ecosystem), flags a scope-collapse pattern distinct from DevRel's gatekeeper/pit-trap taxonomy, sources from apidays, not PlatformCon's internal-IDP audience, builds the loop from the API-design-vs-system-design interview split, and benchmarks compensation against the general engineering/PM ladder rather than a bespoke platform title. Use when the user asks how to hire a platform engineer, API product manager, or partner/integration engineer, write a posting, or design a loop. Do NOT use for candidate prep (samber/developer-platform-skills@developer-platform-career) or DevRel hiring (samber/developer-relations-skills@devrel-hiring).
Write the listing-content rulebook for the operator of a B2B SaaS app marketplace - the standard every third-party listing must meet, covering required fields with objective reject criteria, screenshot and video specs, description quality bars, category taxonomy design, localization posture, badge display rules, and staleness/decay enforcement. Use whenever the user mentions listing standards, a listing rubric or marketplace quality bar, screenshot or media requirements, marketplace categories, rejection criteria, or delisting stale listings - even if they never say "listing standards". Operator side only. Do NOT use for optimizing a vendor's own listing - use samber/developer-platform-skills@integration-listing-optimization instead.
Design the operator-side review and approval process for third-party apps on a B2B SaaS marketplace - review-pipeline shape scaled to data sensitivity, permission and data-access audit checkpoints, automated pre-screening with human triage, objective re-review-on-update triggers, publish-channel hardening against supply-chain attacks, appeal paths, and a severity-tiered revocation policy. Use whenever the user mentions app review, marketplace approval criteria, third-party app permission audits, re-review after an app update, rejection appeals, or delisting and revocation - even if they never say "app review". Operator side only. Do NOT use for submitter onboarding - use samber/developer-platform-skills@partner-app-onboarding instead.
Design bulk file and lake export as a B2B product surface - the two-camp choice between Parquet file-drops on object storage and native warehouse/lake sharing (Snowflake shares, Delta Sharing, linked datasets), the partitioning and schema-evolution contract across batches, delivery cadence and freshness commitments (full dump vs incremental vs CDC vs streaming), shared-bucket security with per-recipient credentials, egress cost allocation, and cross-border data residency. Use whenever the user mentions bulk export, data dumps to S3, Parquet, Snowflake shares, Delta Sharing, or export freshness SLAs - even if they never say "bulk data sharing". Do NOT use for live SQL endpoints - use samber/developer-platform-skills@sql-jdbc-access-design instead.
Plan a SaaS vendor's presence as a source connector on third-party ETL/ELT platforms - demand validation before any build, platform selection from where customers' data stacks run, a build-path menu (platform-managed listing, vendor-maintained SDK connector, custom open-source tap) ranked by who absorbs the maintenance tax, an extraction-readiness audit of the product API, honest CDC scoping (API sources ship pseudo-CDC, never log-based), certification targets, and a funded maintenance plan. Use whenever the user mentions an ETL or ELT catalog listing, a source connector, data-pipeline integration, or adding CDC - even if they never say "connector strategy". Do NOT use for the vendor's own inbound marketplace - use samber/developer-platform-skills@connector-marketplace-strategy instead.
Design a public GraphQL API for third-party developers - the GraphQL-or-not gate, schema conventions (naming, nullability, Node interface, input/payload types), Relay cursor-connection pagination, union/interface error result types, depth and complexity ceilings as design decisions, the federation trust boundary (only the router is ever public), and a persisted-query policy that allowlists first-party traffic only. Use whenever the user mentions GraphQL, a public schema, Relay connections, query depth limits, persisted queries, federation, or GraphQL vs REST - even if they never say "GraphQL API design". Design layer only. Do NOT use for a REST surface review - use samber/developer-platform-skills@public-api-design-review instead.
Design the OAuth2 authorization-server surface a B2B SaaS offers third-party apps - the OAuth 2.1 protocol baseline (PKCE for every client, no implicit or password grants, exact redirect matching), token TTL and refresh-rotation policy, scope taxonomy and granularity, consent-screen design with partial and incremental grants, client registration posture, and the tiered app-verification program. Use whenever the user mentions OAuth, "Sign in with X", access and refresh tokens, scopes, consent screens, PKCE, or third-party apps acting on a customer's behalf - even if they never say "OAuth provider". Issuer side only, not integrating against someone else's OAuth. Do NOT use for API-key design - use samber/developer-platform-skills@api-auth-key-management instead.
Design how a platform surfaces integration failures to the external developers and partners who built against it - per-integration request/event/delivery logs with replay, correlation IDs that survive from response header to support ticket, error-rate aggregation per API key or app split by 4xx/5xx/429, proactive partner notification with cooldowns against alert fatigue, and a provider-side fleet view of which integrations are breaking. Use whenever the user mentions a developer-facing error dashboard, exposing request logs to integrators, alerting partners about broken integrations, or cutting integration support tickets - even if they never say "observability". Do NOT use for platform-wide incident comms - use samber/developer-platform-skills@api-status-communication instead.
Decide a public API's language-SDK portfolio - which languages get official SDKs and in what order, generated vs handwritten build model, official and community support tiers with a promotion gate, SDK deprecation and end-of-life, and decoupling SDK SemVer from API versioning and release cadence. Use whenever the user mentions client libraries, SDKs, which languages to support first, an SDK generator (Stainless, Fern, OpenAPI Generator), community SDKs, or sunsetting an SDK - even if they never say "SDK portfolio". Portfolio strategy only, not single-SDK ergonomics or registry publishing. Do NOT use for whether to offer SDKs as a surface at all - use samber/developer-platform-skills@api-integration-surface-strategy instead.