Loading...
Loading...
Found 60 Skills
7-phase frontend design review with accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA), responsive testing, visual polish. Use for PR reviews, UI audits, or encountering contrast issues, broken layouts, accessibility violations, inconsistent spacing, missing focus states.
Orchestrates a structured design review by running existing skills in a diagnostic funnel, from complexity triage through structural, interface, and surface checks to a full red-flags sweep. Use when reviewing a file, module or PR for overall design quality and you want a comprehensive, prioritized assessment rather than a single-lens check. Not for applying one specific lens (use that skill directly) or for evolutionary analysis of how code changed over time (use code-evolution).
Evaluates test quality using Dave Farley's 8 properties. Use when reviewing tests, assessing test suite quality, or analyzing test effectiveness against TDD best practices.
Review a web app or page for visual design quality — layout, typography, spacing, colour, hierarchy, consistency, interaction patterns, and responsive behaviour. Not a UX audit (that checks usability) — this checks whether it looks professional and polished. Produces a design findings report with screenshots. Triggers: 'design review', 'does this look good', 'review the design', 'check the layout', 'is this polished', 'visual review', 'design audit', 'make it look better', 'it looks off'.
Designer Who Codes: visual audit then fixes with atomic commits and before/after screenshots. Useful for tightening shipped UI before launch.
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish". Proactively suggest when the user mentions visual inconsistencies or wants to polish the look of a live site.
UI and design review: evaluate visual quality, responsive behavior, accessibility, color/contrast, typography, layout consistency, and i18n readiness using browser-based validation against industrial standards.
Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project design standards. Run this before handing a design document to programmers.
Comprehensive Power BI data model design review prompt for evaluating model architecture, relationships, and optimization opportunities.
Reviews REST API designs for quality, consistency, and breaking changes. Lints OpenAPI specs, generates API scorecards, and detects breaking changes between versions. Use when designing APIs, reviewing API contracts, or managing API versioning.
A dedicated skill for security code review of OpenHarmony distributed systems. Triggered when users make requests such as "review code security implementation", "code security audit", "security code review" or similar distributed system code security review requests. This skill provides detailed review guidance for 18 security design rules for OpenHarmony distributed services, covering security areas such as authorization control, state machines, data transmission, permission management, and trusted relationships. Using this skill, you can conduct specialized security reviews for OpenHarmony distributed systems based on general cybersecurity rules.
Analyzes code based on John Ousterhout's "A Philosophy of Software Design". Identifies unnecessary complexity, shallow modules, information leaks, and design problems. Use when reviewing architecture, PRs, refactoring, or asking about code quality.