Loading...
Loading...
Found 22 Skills
Read back adr-patterns + adr-edges namespaces, surface dangling refs / supersede cycles / status mismatches; exit 1 on cycles
Architecture Decision Records and living architecture documentation. Activate when making technology choices, defining system boundaries, recording architectural decisions, or creating/updating ARCHITECTURE.md. Covers ADR format, decision governance, design facilitation, and architectural review.
Plan a new feature from concept to approved implementation plan. Activates Product Council for strategic evaluation, then Feature Council for technical planning. Produces a documented decision and scoped task breakdown. Use when starting any new feature work.
Search the FPF knowledge base and display hypothesis details with assurance information
Validate Architecture Decision Records (ADR) against Layer 5 schema standards
Document the finalized tech stack selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent records. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four categories: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively trigger after making important choices during feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record the decision", "archive tech selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive proposed solutions under discussion.
Build and refine the project's domain model. Suitable for users who want to clarify domain terms or ubiquitous language, record architectural decisions, or when other skills need to maintain the domain model.
Use when writing or reviewing anything that will be read as true — a decision record, a README, an acceptance report, a runbook, a changelog entry, an audit finding, or any claim that something was verified. Applies the ten canons of evidence-backed documentation — what makes a claim documentation rather than an assertion — and routes to the doctrine that enforces each one. Also use when a project needs a documentation gate, a decision register, a propagation matrix, or a retrospective that outlives its author. Triggers - 'documentation gate', 'decision record', 'ADR', 'acceptance report', 'runbook', 'is this verified', 'доказательная документация', 'записать решение', 'отчёт о приёмке', 'раннбук', 'чем это подтверждено', 'доки в синхроне'. Not for: drafts, chat answers, commit messages or code comments — say 'без доков' to opt out.
Correct, create, or remove written material so a later reader can rely on it: documentation that no longer matches the system, a fact about to be written down a second time, prose restating what a config file or command already prints, a records folder that has drifted, or a decision worth recording so it stops being re-argued. Prose no human has read counts as a hypothesis, not a source. Use when the user says "the docs are out of date", "readme still says the old flow", "where does this go", "write this down", or "should this be an ADR". Not for judging docs inside a change under review, explaining an existing document, or looking up a third party documentation.
Search the FPF knowledge base and display hypothesis details with assurance information