Loading...
Loading...
Found 31 Skills
Guide for recording significant architectural and design decisions in docs/decisions.md. Use this skill when clearly significant architectural decisions are made (database choices, frameworks, core design patterns) or when explicitly asked to document a decision. Be conservative - only suggest for major decisions, not minor implementation details.
Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. Part of the skills-for-java project
Framework for structured product decision-making. Use when facing complex tradeoffs, aligning stakeholders, documenting decisions, or choosing between multiple valid approaches.
Byzantine consensus voting for multi-agent decision making. Implements voting protocols, conflict resolution, and agreement algorithms for reaching consensus among multiple agents.
This skill is used when users request phrases such as 'handle PR review issues', 'fix review items', 'resolve PR feedback', 'process review issues one by one', 'complete review tasks', 'run pr review resolver', 'resolve PR review', 'address review comments', 'fix review findings', or 'handle code review'. It reads the review comments of the PR associated with the current branch, discusses each unresolved issue with the user one by one, lets the user decide on the handling approach, and executes fixes in parallel as background subtasks.
Resolve implementation ambiguities before planning begins. Two modes: Discussion mode surfaces gray areas with concrete options for greenfield work. Assumptions mode reads the codebase, forms evidence-based opinions, and asks the user to correct only what's wrong (brownfield work). Use for "discuss ambiguities", "resolve gray areas", "clarify before planning", "assumptions mode", "what are the gray areas", "before we plan". Do NOT use for broad design exploration (use feature-design) or for planning itself (use feature-plan).
Generate a stakeholder update tailored to audience and cadence. Use when writing a weekly or monthly status for leadership, announcing a launch, escalating a risk or blocker, or translating the same progress into exec-brief, engineering-detail, or customer-facing versions.
Create structured technology trade-off analysis documents with scored comparison matrices. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compare technologies, evaluate architectural options, analyze build-vs-buy decisions, assess migration strategies, or produce any decision document that compares multiple approaches across weighted dimensions. Triggers on: 'trade-off analysis', 'tradeoff', 'comparison matrix', 'evaluate options', 'which technology should we use', 'compare approaches', 'pros and cons of', 'build vs buy', 'migration analysis', 'consolidation analysis', 'technology selection'. Also use when the user has completed technical research and wants to structure findings into a decision document.
[Planning] Validate plan with critical questions interview
Document coding decisions, patterns, and language features as you write code in real-time. Activate at the start of a coding session to capture the reasoning behind each meaningful decision as it happens. Creates structured learning entries in the .decodie/ directory.
Align stakeholders and secure buy-in by producing a Stakeholder Alignment Pack (alignment brief, stakeholder map, exec decision principles, pre-brief plan, alignment meeting plan, decision summary + comms). Use for stakeholder alignment, buy-in, executive alignment, cross-functional alignment. Category: Communication.
Document finalized technology selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent documents. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four types: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively push when important choices are made after feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record decision", "archive technology selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive under-discussion solutions.