Loading...
Loading...
Found 31 Skills
Analyzes fundamental questions and concepts through philosophical lens using logic, epistemology, metaphysics, and critical analysis frameworks. Provides insights on meaning, truth, knowledge, existence, reasoning, and conceptual clarity. Use when: Conceptual ambiguity, logical arguments, foundational assumptions, meaning questions. Evaluates: Validity, soundness, coherence, assumptions, implications, conceptual clarity.
Challenge ideas, assumptions, and decisions by playing devil's advocate to identify weaknesses and prevent groupthink
Apply Hegelian dialectics (thesis-antithesis-synthesis) to analyze contradictions and generate higher-order understanding. Use this skill when the user needs to resolve opposing viewpoints, find creative synthesis between conflicting positions, or move past binary thinking — even if they say 'both sides have valid points', 'how do we reconcile these views', or 'is there a third option'.
Use when facing complex decisions, architectural trade-offs, philosophical questions, or any problem requiring deep analysis before action. Use when the user asks to "think deeply", "question assumptions", "analyze from first principles", "challenge this decision", debates between two approaches (e.g. monolith vs microservices, build vs buy, SSR vs CSR), or invokes /socrates. Also triggered when other skills need a thinking engine for rigorous pre-analysis. Even if the problem seems simple, if there are hidden assumptions worth examining, this skill applies.
Deep Reading Collaborative System: A system leveraging multi-layered AI Agents to help transform articles from "read" to "understood" to "mastered", and convert knowledge into actionable plans. Use this system when you need to deeply understand complex articles/papers, systematically organize reading notes, think critically about content, discover hidden logical issues and assumptions, or turn knowledge into action plans. Trigger keywords: deep reading, critical thinking, reading notes, article analysis, Socratic questioning, action plan
Langgeladi Cognition Check. Two modes: Trace (an idea → trace to the bottom layer → build a system) and Topple (a wrong cognition → flip → see the truth). Trigger methods: /lang-think, "I have an idea", "I think XX is because of YY", "help me figure this out", "is this view correct" Langgeladi cognition check. Two modes: Trace (idea → first principles → system) and Topple (wrong belief → flip → truth). Trigger: /lang-think, "I have an idea", "help me think this through", "is this right"
Karl Marx's thinking framework and critical methodology. Epistemological principles, decision heuristics, rhetorical devices and polemic engines are extracted from 17 core works, to analyze social phenomena, economic issues and political events from Marx's perspective. Trigger WHEN: "from Marx's perspective", "what would Marx think", "Marx mode", "historical materialism analysis", "help me analyze from Marx's angle", "switch to Marx".
Apply a structured judgment and discernment framework to any high-stakes decision, recommendation, or AI-generated output. Use this skill whenever the user wants to think more carefully before committing to something — a people decision, a strategic call, a piece of writing they're about to send, or an AI output they're not sure whether to trust. Trigger on phrases like "is this right?", "am I confident about this?", "help me think this through", "run the discernment framework", "judgment check", "calibration check", "am I being overconfident", "should I trust this output", "premortem", or any time someone is wrestling with whether their thinking is sound. Also trigger proactively when someone appears to be accepting a claim, recommendation, or AI-generated output without questioning it — especially on high-stakes topics like hiring, restructuring, or communications that will reach many people.
Combine multiple mental models for richer analysis. Use for complex problems requiring multiple lenses, high-stakes decisions, or when single models leave blind spots.
Apply Socratic questioning — systematic inquiry via clarification, assumption-probing, evidence-testing, perspective-shifting, implication-tracing, and meta-questions — to coach learning or surface hidden assumptions in a person's reasoning. Use this skill when the user is explicitly facilitating learning, coaching a person through their own thinking, or needs a structured questioning sequence to probe a held belief, even if they say 'play devil's advocate on this claim' or 'how should I coach my team through this problem via questions'. Do NOT use for open-ended brainstorming, information gathering, or requirements-discovery question lists where no belief is being probed.
Socratic coach for breaking down problems to fundamental truths. Use when users want to think through a problem deeply, challenge assumptions, or find innovative solutions. Triggers on requests like "help me think through this", "let's break this down", "what are my blind spots", "I'm stuck on a problem", "challenge my assumptions", or explicit requests for first-principles thinking.
Break any problem down to fundamental truths, then rebuild solutions from atoms up. Use when user says "firstp", "first principles", "from scratch", "what are we assuming", "break this down", "atomic", "fundamental truth", "physics thinking", "Elon method", "bedrock", "ground up", "core problem", "strip away", or challenges assumptions about how things are done.