Loading...
Loading...
Found 35 Skills
· Audit AI-generated code slop: hallucinated APIs, over-abstraction, duplicate code, test theater, noisy comments. Triggers: 'slop', 'AI-generated code', 'cleanup', 'overengineered'. Not for prose (use anti-ai-prose).
Comprehensive codebase quality audit with parallel agent orchestration, GitHub issue creation, automated PR generation per issue, and PM-prioritized recommendations. Use for code review, refactoring audits, technical debt analysis, module quality assessment, or codebase health checks.
Analyze code examples in SKILL.md files for correctness using static analysis and TypeScript compilation
Run a comprehensive Go-to-Market and launch readiness review for a project phase. Combines marketing content audit, code quality review, performance audit, accessibility audit, infrastructure readiness, and business review with council evaluation. Use before phase launches or when GTM review issues are ready.
Go-specific code review with 6-phase methodology: Context, Automated Checks, Quality Analysis, Specific Analysis, Line-by-Line, Documentation. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or auditing Go codebases for quality and best practices. Use for "review Go", "Go PR", "check Go code", "Go quality", "review .go". Do NOT use for writing new Go code, debugging Go bugs, or refactoring -- use golang-general-engineer, systematic-debugging, or systematic-refactoring for those tasks.
Run a comprehensive code review
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "code review", "check my code", "audit code", "find bugs", "security review", "performance review", or any ServiceNow code quality assessment.
Load PROACTIVELY when task involves reviewing code, auditing quality, or validating implementations. Use when user says "review this code", "check this PR", "audit the codebase", or "score this implementation". Covers the 10-dimension weighted scoring rubric (correctness, security, performance, architecture, testing, error handling, type safety, maintainability, accessibility, documentation), automated pattern detection for anti-patterns, and structured review output with actionable findings.
Code quality gatekeeper and auditor. Enforces strict quality gates, resolves the AI verification gap, and evaluates codebases across 12 critical dimensions with evidence-based scoring. Use when auditing code quality, reviewing AI-generated code, scoring codebases against industry standards, or enforcing pre-commit quality gates. Use for quality audit, code review, codebase evaluation, security assessment, technical debt analysis.
Worker that checks DRY/KISS/YAGNI/architecture compliance with quantitative Code Quality Score. Validates architectural decisions via MCP Ref: (1) Optimality (2) Compliance (3) Performance. Reports issues with SEC-, PERF-, MNT-, ARCH-, BP-, OPT- prefixes.
Use when the user asks to perform a code review, review code changes, analyze a diff, or audit code quality. Runs a structured review of git diff output covering security, correctness, performance, maintainability, and style. Produces a markdown report saved as a .md file named after the current branch.
Validate, lint, audit, or check Makefiles and .mk files for errors.