Loading...
Loading...
Found 53 Skills
Write a structured architecture decision document — an RFC / design doc / technical doc that records *why* a non-trivial technical choice was made, not just what was built. Follows a six-part method: contextualize for a newcomer, state the architecturally-relevant requirements, design components against them with static + dynamic diagrams, weigh every alternative by pros / cons / risks (each risk with impact, probability, mitigation, contingency), record the decision and how it was made, then conclude and communicate. Writes in the language of the request. Reach for it whenever someone is choosing between technical options or documenting one — "write an RFC", "design doc", "architecture decision", "ADR", "tradeoff analysis", "technical documentation of an implementation", "help me decide between X and Y" — even if they never say "RFC". Also fits the retrospective variant: documenting an implementation after the fact (lessons learned, version history).
Creates implementation-ready plans and specs for complex changes without writing code. Use when the user asks for a plan/spec/roadmap, requests a detailed plan, or when a change spans multiple files/systems and needs discovery, sequencing, or architecture decisions.
Write a lightweight technical design document for ambiguous or consequential architecture decisions before implementation.
Creates an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documenting a significant technical decision. Follows the standard ADR format with context, decision, and consequences. Invoked when the user says "write an ADR", "document this decision", or "create an architecture record".
Creates agent-optimized technical design documents with context-layer-aware progressive disclosure for architecture decisions, component design, and data models. Use when writing technical designs, architecture docs, defining system components, or making technology choices for spec-driven development.
ADR management skill. Auto-invoked for generating architecture decisions, documenting design rationale, and maintaining the decision record log. Uses native read/write tools to scaffold and update ADR markdown files.
Turborepo monorepo architecture decisions and anti-patterns. Use when: (1) choosing between monorepo vs polyrepo, (2) deciding when to split packages, (3) debugging cache misses, (4) setting package boundaries, (5) avoiding circular dependencies. NOT for CLI syntax (see turbo --help). Focuses on architectural decisions that prevent monorepo sprawl and maintenance nightmares. Triggers: turborepo, monorepo, package boundaries, when to split packages, turbo cache miss, circular dependency, workspace organization, task dependencies.
Get a second opinion from leading AI models on code, architecture, strategy, prompting, or anything. Queries models via OpenRouter, Gemini, or OpenAI APIs. Supports single opinion, multi-model consensus, and devil's advocate patterns. Trigger with 'brains trust', 'second opinion', 'ask gemini', 'ask gpt', 'peer review', 'consult', 'challenge this', or 'devil's advocate'.
Generate technical design documents with proper structure, diagrams, and implementation details. Default language is English unless user requests Chinese.
Use when making architecture decisions, evaluating build-vs-buy, planning tech stack, prioritizing tech debt, writing PRDs, or needing strategic technical leadership
Guide architectural design decisions for software systems. Use this skill when designing new systems, evaluating architecture trade-offs, or creating technical design documents. Helps produce clear, well-structured design artifacts including component diagrams, data flow, and decision records.
Explains Single Page Applications (SPA), Multi Page Applications (MPA), and hybrid architectures. Use when discussing app architecture decisions, comparing SPA vs MPA, explaining how traditional vs modern web apps work, or when building a new web application.