Loading...
Loading...
Found 29 Skills
Use when you need to produce a D2 decision document (RFC/Decision Doc) for a Spec Pack, and need to independently decide whether to execute D0 (bypass design via diversion) and D1 (optional research) even under pressure, avoiding guessing FEATURE_DIR, making up input details, writing design as implementation specifics, or leaving behind TODO/To-Confirm lists.
Use when you need to perform D1 research during the Spec-level design phase (output `{FEATURE_DIR}/design/research.md`), or when you face critical uncertainties/high-risk points that require verification first instead of directly proceeding to D2; common symptoms include lack of evidence to support trade-offs, unknown items written as TODOs/to-be-confirmed issues, attempting to guess the FEATURE_DIR under pressure, or writing research as implementation details.
Use when you need to execute I1 (Implementation Plan) in the Spec Pack of sdlc-dev, convert requirements/design into `{FEATURE_DIR}/implementation/plan.md` (the single source of truth (SSOT) for execution checklist and status), and provide an unambiguous task list for subsequent I2 execution.
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Use this when you need to execute R4 (generate an interactive Demo project based on requirements/prototype.md) in the sdlc-dev product requirement Spec process, and need to avoid skipping spec-context, proceeding when prototype.md is missing or the runnable Demo project root directory is missing, or creating custom pages/directories that lead to untraceability and inability to close the loop.
Use when you need to locate the current spec pack (FEATURE_DIR) in the Spec process of sdlc-dev, avoid reading or writing requirements/*.md in the wrong directory, or encounter issues such as "misreading context/writing to the wrong file/non-compliant branch".
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when you need to generate `{FEATURE_DIR}/verification/report-{date}-{version}.md` (test report) during the verification phase of Spec Pack, provide deliverable conclusions that are traceable to test cases and defect references.
Used when a Spec Pack is completed, reusable assets need to be promoted to the project SSOT (ADR/contract/ops/NFR/registry), and there are risks of "contaminating the project with full package replication / skipping spec-context / mistaking merge-back for git merge".
Use this when you are about to start Discover for an existing project, but you don't know "which portals can be used as evidence (run/test/ci/contract/ops)" and "which modules should be prioritized (P0/P1/P2)", and you are worried that out-of-control scope will lead to unmaintainable results.
Use when you need to generate/update test plans, test cases, test suites or test reports during the verification phase of Spec Pack, and require strict access control, traceable artifact storage, and no unauthorized routing.
Use when you need to generate "page list → function points → business processes → business rules" with evidence from frontend code, and the project has non-unique routing entries, complex dynamic routes/permissions/backend menus, and the team is prone to making assumptions or missing evidence chains.