Loading...
Loading...
Found 82 Skills
Expert guidance for writing high-quality academic and research papers. Use when the user wants to write, structure, revise, or improve academic papers, research articles, conference papers, or technical reports. Provides comprehensive support for all stages from planning to final polish.
For users needing to conduct systematic literature reviews, literature reviews, related work, or literature research: AI automatically generates search terms, performs multi-source retrieval → deduplication → AI reads and scores each paper one by one (1–10 points for semantic relevance and sub-topic grouping) → selects papers based on high-score priority ratio → automatically generates word budget for the review (70% cited sections + 30% non-cited sections, average of three samplings) → free writing in the style of senior domain experts (fixed sections: abstract, introduction, sub-topics, discussion, future outlook, conclusion), with strict verification of main text word count and number of references, and mandatory export to PDF and Word. Supports multilingual translation and intelligent compilation (en/zh/ja/de/fr/es).
Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.
Draft economics papers with proper structure and academic style
Orchestrate manuscript revision by routing feedback to specialized writing skills
Write-up support for qualitative interview research in sociology. Guides methods and findings drafting with emphasis on argument-driven narrative, not formulaic quote display.
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
Creates formal academic research papers following IEEE/ACM formatting standards with proper structure, citations, and scholarly writing style. Use when the user asks to write a research paper, academic paper, or conference paper on any topic.
Use when reviewing or editing research manuscripts, journal articles, reviews, or perspectives. Invoke when user mentions manuscript, paper draft, article, research writing, journal submission, reviewer feedback, or needs to improve scientific writing clarity, structure, or argumentation in their manuscript.
Draft publication-ready Methods sections for interview-based sociology articles. Guides pathway selection, component coverage, and calibration based on analysis of 77 Social Problems/Social Forces articles.
Logic coherence pass for per-H3 section files: enforce a clear paragraph-1 thesis and surface paragraph-island risks (connector stats are diagnostic, not a quota) before merging. **Trigger**: logic polisher, section logic, thesis statement, connectors, 段落逻辑, 连接词, 论证主线, 润色逻辑. **Use when**: `sections/S*.md` exist but read like paragraph islands; you want a targeted, debuggable self-loop before `section-merger`. **Skip if**: sections are missing/thin (fix `subsection-writer` first) or evidence packs/briefs are scaffolded (fix C3/C4 first). **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: do not add new citations; do not invent facts; do not change citation keys; do not move citations across subsections.
Draft publication-ready Theory sections for sociology research. Guides structure, paragraph functions, sentence craft, and calibration based on analysis of 80 Social Problems/Social Forces articles.