Loading...
Loading...
Found 65 Skills
Provides final code cleanup after task review approval. Removes debug logs, temporary comments, dead code, optimizes imports, and improves readability. Use when asked to clean up code, polish, finalize, tidy up, remove technical debt, or prepare code for completion after review. Not for refactoring logic or fixing bugs—focused solely on cosmetic and hygiene cleanup.
Systematically analyze codebase structure, complexity, dependencies, and architectural patterns to understand project organization
Expert code refactoring specialist for improving code quality without changing behavior. Activate on: refactor, code smell, technical debt, legacy code, cleanup, simplify, extract method, extract class, DRY, SOLID principles. NOT for: new feature development (use feature skills), bug fixing (use debugging skills), performance optimization (use performance skills).
Refactor codebases using Design by Typed Holes methodology - iterative, test-driven refactoring with formal hole resolution, constraint propagation, and continuous validation. Use when refactoring existing code, optimizing architecture, or consolidating technical debt through systematic hole-driven development.
Use when solution space exploration is complete and you're ready to create an implementation plan. Enforces "simple over easy" - the fundamentally right solution, not the path of least resistance. Triggers after /design-solution, when a solution has been chosen, or when asked to "make a plan" or "create a plan".
Analyze, consolidate, and document codebases through multi-perspective analysis. Use when reviewing project structure, planning refactoring, creating documentation, or assessing technical debt.
Comprehensive codebase quality audit with parallel agent orchestration, GitHub issue creation, automated PR generation per issue, and PM-prioritized recommendations. Use for code review, refactoring audits, technical debt analysis, module quality assessment, or codebase health checks.
Code refactoring expert for improving code quality, readability, maintainability, and performance. Specializes in Java and Python refactoring patterns, eliminating code smells, and applying clean code principles. Use when refactoring code, improving existing implementations, or cleaning up technical debt.
Scan and analyze a software repository or project for design quality using principles from A Philosophy of Software Design by John Ousterhout. Use when user asks to review, audit, scan, or evaluate code quality, design quality, architecture, or technical debt. Also trigger for: code review, design review, complexity analysis, code health check, module depth analysis, information hiding review, how good is my code, review my project, find design problems, what is wrong with my codebase, rate my code, or anything about evaluating software design quality at a structural level. This is not a linter or style checker. It evaluates deep design qualities like module depth, abstraction quality, information hiding, and complexity patterns.
Restructures existing code to improve readability, maintainability, and performance without changing external behavior. USE WHEN: Restructuring code without changing behavior, extracting methods/classes, removing duplication, applying design patterns, improving code organization, reducing technical debt. DO NOT USE: For bug fixes (use /debugging), for adding tests (use /testing), for new features (implement directly). TRIGGERS: refactor, restructure, rewrite, clean up, simplify, extract, inline, rename, move, split, merge, decompose, modularize, decouple, technical debt, code smell, DRY, SOLID, improve code, modernize, reorganize.
Improve code quality, reduce technical debt, restructure for maintainability
Apply safe refactoring patterns to improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when cleaning up code, reducing technical debt, or improving maintainability.