Loading...
Loading...
Found 313 Skills
TDD-style testing methodology for skills using fresh subagent instances to prevent priming bias and validate skill effectiveness. Use when validating skill improvements, testing skill effectiveness, preventing priming bias, measuring skill impact on behavior. Do not use when implementing skills (use skill-authoring instead), creating hooks (use hook-authoring instead).
Progressive context refinement pattern for subagents. Solves the problem of agents not knowing what context they need until they start working. Uses a 4-phase loop: DISPATCH, EVALUATE, REFINE, LOOP.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "optimize CLAUDE.md", "create a new skill", "write a custom agent", "configure hooks", "manage context window", "set up MCP servers", "scaffold a skill package", "analyze token budget", "create subagents", "configure permissions", "set up worktrees", or "integrate Claude Code with editors". Use for Claude Code CLI mastery, skill authoring, context engineering, hooks automation, subagent creation, and development workflow optimization.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
Comprehensive code investigation and audit tool. Discovers all project features, then dispatches parallel subagents to analyze issues, risks, dead code, missing functionality, and redundancies. Produces a prioritized risk report. Use this skill when the user asks to "investigate code", "audit project", "find risks", "check code quality", "analyze codebase", "what's wrong with this code", "project health check", "code review entire project", "find dead code", "find redundant code", or any request for a thorough codebase analysis.
Orchestrate subagent workflows for complex tasks that benefit from decomposition, role-based delegation, and parallel execution. Use when Codex should assemble a temporary team of subagents, choose roles from a reusable role library, create a controlled fallback role when no preset role fits, coordinate read-heavy work in parallel, or handle write-heavy work with ownership boundaries, staged execution, and an integrator-led merge path.
Use when asked to do a full build, complete build, rebuild, or build everything in a Quarkus project. Runs the full Quarkus build with optimized flags via a subagent to keep the main conversation responsive.
Use when working with *.excalidraw or *.excalidraw.json files, user mentions diagrams/flowcharts, or requests architecture visualization - delegates all Excalidraw operations to subagents to prevent context exhaustion from verbose JSON (single files: 4k-22k tokens, can exceed read limits)
Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill mechanisms (4) ask about Claude Code, Cursor, or similar agent internals (5) want to build agents for business, research, creative, or operational tasks Keywords: agent, assistant, autonomous, workflow, tool use, multi-step, orchestration
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
Use when asked to detect silent failures/weak error handling or explicitly asked to run the silent-failure-hunter subagent.
Use when explicitly asked to run the security-reviewer subagent or when another skill requires the security-reviewer agent card.