Loading...
Loading...
Found 39 Skills
Guides self-review of YOUR OWN academic paper before submission with adversarial stress-testing. Core method: 5-aspect checklist (contribution sufficiency, writing clarity, results quality, testing completeness, method design), counterintuitive protocol (reject-first simulation, delete unsupported claims, score trust, promote limitations, attack novelty), reverse-outlining, and figure/table quality checks. Use when: user wants to self-review or self-check their own paper draft before submission, stress-test their claims, prepare for reviewer criticism, or mentions 'self-review', 'check my draft', 'is my paper ready'. Do NOT use for writing a peer review of someone else's paper, and do NOT use after receiving actual reviews (use paper-rebuttal instead).
Help the user shape technical blog posts, website articles, devlogs, essays, or long-form drafts without writing the full post for them. Use this whenever the user shares rough notes, a brain dump, unordered ideas, bullet points, or half-written sections, or asks for help turning notes into an outline, finding the angle, sharpening the hook or thesis, improving structure, clarifying the argument, tightening flow, stress-testing the payoff, or making a technical piece more engaging while preserving their voice. Use it even if the user does not explicitly ask for a writing guide, as long as they need help organizing and developing a post rather than having it ghostwritten. Guide with organization, critique, focused questions, and tiny example lines only; do not write the final article.
Adversarial thinking partner for founders and executives. Stress-tests plans, prepares for board meetings, dissects decisions with no good options, forces honest post-mortems, and identifies blind spots before competitors or board members do. Use when you need plan validation, board preparation, hard decision frameworks, assumption stress-testing, failure analysis, or when user mentions stress test, challenge, board prep, hard decision, pre-mortem, post-mortem, devil's advocate, plan review, or executive coaching.
Orchestrates multi-advisor council debates on high-impact architecture, technology, or product decisions. Dispatches 3-5 domain archetype subagents (pragmatic-engineer, architect-advisor, security-advocate, product-mind, devils-advocate, the-thinker) through opening statements, tensions, position evolution, and synthesis phases. Preserves dissent and delivers actionable recommendations with captured risks. Use when evaluating trade-offs, stress-testing a PRD or tech spec, resolving dilemmas with multiple viable options, or when a decision needs diverse expert perspectives. Don't use for simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, creative brainstorming without tradeoffs, or tasks where a single expert perspective suffices.
Multi-perspective dialectical reasoning with cross-evaluative synthesis. Spawns parallel evaluative lenses (STRUCTURAL, EVIDENTIAL, SCOPE, ADVERSARIAL, PRAGMATIC) that critique thesis AND critique each other's critiques, producing N-squared evaluation matrix before recursive aggregation. Triggers on /critique, /dialectic, /crosseval, requests for thorough analysis, stress-testing arguments, or finding weaknesses. Implements Hegelian refinement enhanced with interleaved multi-domain evaluation and convergent synthesis.
Use this skill when users need to validate if their business can scale, stress-test their model, or assess bottlenecks. Activates for "can this scale," "validate my business model," "what's my bottleneck," or when planning for growth.
Calculate portfolio risk metrics including VaR, CVaR, Sharpe, Sortino, and drawdown analysis. Use when measuring portfolio risk, implementing risk limits, or building risk monitoring systems.
Send commands to ESP32 and microcontrollers via serial port to emulate button presses and user actions. Use for automated testing, stress testing, and debugging without physical interaction.
Activate a brutally honest, skeptical architectural partner that stress-tests ideas, architectures, and assumptions. Use when the user says "reality check", wants their design challenged, asks if their idea is sound, wants a devil's advocate review, or wants architectural critique without hand-holding.
Under the assumption that the US dollar or a certain currency loses its reserve status and gold becomes the only anchor, deduce the 'implied gold price that the balance sheet can withstand' by dividing central bank monetary liabilities by gold reserves, and output the leverage level, gap and ranking of each country or currency.
Harden designs for real-world use by systematically identifying and designing for every condition outside the happy path. Part of the Intent design strategy system. Covers state inventories, error recovery, empty states, loading patterns, first-run experiences, stress testing, internationalization readiness, and latency handling. Trigger on: edge cases, error states, empty states, loading states, first-run experience, onboarding, offline mode, "what happens when", "what if the user", "stress test this", "what could go wrong", "harden this design", "edge case review", "what are the failure modes", zero states, timeout handling, or any question about how a design behaves outside ideal conditions. The happy path is a fantasy — this skill designs for the world your users actually live in.
Performance testing specialist for load testing, stress testing, and performance optimization across applications and infrastructure