Loading...
Loading...
Found 23 Skills
Use when substantive documents (reviews, analyses, synthesis documents) need adversarial review to strengthen arguments, identify weak points, and challenge assumptions before editorial polish (mandatory for Writer → Devil's Advocate pairing protocol)
Deep research expert for comprehensive technical investigations. Use when conducting technology evaluations, comparing solutions, analyzing papers, or exploring technical trends.
Use when "literature review", "research synthesis", "systematic review", "academic search", or asking about "find papers", "cite sources", "research gaps", "meta-analysis", "bibliography"
Use when the user needs research methodology, long-form content creation, academic-style citations, fact-checking, or evidence-based writing with proper source attribution. Trigger conditions: whitepaper drafting, research article writing, source evaluation, citation management, fact-checking protocol, case study creation, evidence-based argumentation.
Apply Bhaskar's critical realism to analyze phenomena through three ontological domains (real, actual, empirical), identify generative causal mechanisms via retroduction, and examine structure-agency interplay. Use this skill when the user needs to go beyond surface correlations to underlying causes, design research that distinguishes mechanisms from events from experiences, or when they ask 'what causes this beyond the observed pattern', 'what structures enable or constrain this behavior', or 'how do I move from correlation to causal explanation'.
Conduct a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework with explicit search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment, and transparent synthesis. Use this skill when the user needs to design a reproducible literature search, apply PRISMA flow documentation, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, assess study quality, or when they ask 'how do I do a systematic review', 'what is PRISMA', or 'how do I make my literature review reproducible'.
Use when doing upstream market-research methodology — sizing a market as TAM/SAM/SOM computed BOTH top-down and bottoms-up (never a single unsourced number), planning a survey sample size with finite-population correction and per-segment minimums, or scoring candidate market segments against Kotler's measurable/substantial/accessible/differentiable/actionable criteria. Outputs always show the method and the assumptions. For market-research analysts and product-marketing at the sizing/survey/segmentation moment. Distinct from marketing-skill (campaign analytics, attribution, demand-gen) — this is the evidence-building methodology, not live-campaign optimization.
Write, structure, or review a PhD/Master's research proposal. Use when drafting a research proposal, preparing for committee review, writing a thesis outline, or aligning methodology with academic requirements.
Six-phase protocol for adapting methods across research domains
Design and execute reproducible systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other evidence synthesis processes. Use when the user asks for "conduct a systematic review", "how to conduct a scoping review", "design a screening process", or requests the rw-review-methods workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Writes and edits scientific and academic papers in LaTeX following rigorous research methodology. Use when the user asks to write, edit, expand, structure, or review any academic paper, research paper, technical report, or LaTeX document. Triggers on mentions of papers, LaTeX, .tex files, abstracts, literature reviews, methodology sections, theorems, proofs, citations, or BibTeX. Covers the full research lifecycle from problem formulation through publication-ready output.