Loading...
Loading...
Found 22 Skills
Paper reviewer that evaluates machine learning research projects following official ICML reviewer guidelines. Provides comprehensive reviews with actionable feedback across all key dimensions: claims/evidence, relation to prior work, originality, significance, clarity, and reproducibility. Also provides formative feedback on incomplete drafts, proposals, and research code repositories. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: review paper, ICML review, paper review, evaluate paper, research paper feedback, ML paper review, conference review, academic review, paper critique, NeurIPS review, ICLR review, project proposal, research proposal, paper draft, early feedback, incomplete paper, work in progress, WIP review, review repo, review codebase, research project review
Audit a CS or AI research project for reproducibility across environment, data, code, configuration, logging, and documentation. Use this skill whenever the user wants to make experiments reproducible, prepare code for collaborators, debug environment drift, write a README, package a project for paper release, or ensure they can rerun results months later.
Use this tool when the user explicitly requests "update project guide", "sync guide", or "deposit insights into the guide". It saves newly generated reusable writing insights from conversations to the project guide file in real time, ensuring consistent terminology, stable structure, verifiability and reproducibility. The guide file path must be specified when invoking.
Prepare and publish a research code repository for public release alongside a paper (arXiv, conference, GitHub). Use when the user wants to open-source code, create a GitHub release, package a code submission, make code public, or prepare a reproducibility release.
Evaluate the reproducibility of technical articles. Dispatch a subagent to simulate a first-time reader reproducing the work locally and list missing information. Use as the final check on a draft before publication.
Computational provenance audit verifying every number, table, and figure in a manuscript derives from code, not manual entry. Triggers on: "check provenance", "verify reproducibility", "audit my pipeline", "are my numbers from code", "provenance audit". Companion to manuscript-review (prose audit).
Refactor Scikit-learn and machine learning code to improve maintainability, reproducibility, and adherence to best practices. This skill transforms working ML code into production-ready pipelines that prevent data leakage and ensure reproducible results. It addresses preprocessing outside pipelines, missing random_state parameters, improper cross-validation, and custom transformers not following sklearn API conventions. Implements proper Pipeline and ColumnTransformer patterns, systematic hyperparameter tuning, and appropriate evaluation metrics.
Refactor PyTorch code to improve maintainability, readability, and adherence to best practices. Identifies and fixes DRY violations, long functions, deep nesting, SRP violations, and opportunities for modular components. Applies PyTorch 2.x patterns including torch.compile optimization, Automatic Mixed Precision (AMP), optimized DataLoader configuration, modular nn.Module design, gradient checkpointing, CUDA memory management, PyTorch Lightning integration, custom Dataset classes, model factory patterns, weight initialization, and reproducibility patterns.
Expert methodology for analyzing and summarizing research papers, extracting key contributions, methodological details, and contextualizing findings. Use when reading papers from PDFs, DOIs, or URLs to create structured summaries for researchers.
Use this skill for "review this paper", "review this manuscript", "peer review", "review my paper", "critique this manuscript", "review this submission", "give me feedback on my paper", "check my methods", "review my statistics", "review as a peer reviewer", "evaluate this manuscript", "review this PDF", or mentions manuscript review, peer review, paper critique, or methodological review.