Loading...
Loading...
Found 30 Skills
Guide for writing tests. Use when adding new functionality, fixing bugs, or when tests are needed. Emphasizes integration tests, real-world fixtures, and regression coverage.
Standardize requirement/feature changes in an existing codebase (especially Chrome extensions) by turning "改需求/需求变更/调整交互/改功能/重构流程" into a repeatable loop: clarify acceptance criteria, confirm current behavior from code, assess impact/risk, design the new logic, implement with small diffs, run a fixed regression checklist, and update docs/decision log. Use when the user feels the change process is chaotic, when edits tend to sprawl across files, or when changes touch manifest/service worker/OAuth/storage/UI and need reliable verification + rollback planning.
Snapshot test email templates using Verify to catch regressions. Validates rendered HTML output matches approved baseline. Works with MJML templates and any email renderer.
Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.
Systematic web application QA testing with structured issue taxonomy, health scoring, and regression tracking. Use this skill when the user asks for QA testing, systematic testing, smoke testing, regression testing, web app testing, browser testing, or says "QA this", "test the app", "smoke test", "run QA", "systematic test", "check the site", "regression test", "full QA", "/qa-systematic". Supports full, quick, and regression modes.
Generate comprehensive test plans, test cases, regression test suites, automation annotations, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation. Use when planning QA before execution, documenting test strategies, marking which flows require E2E follow-up, or creating structured bug reports. Do not use for executing tests against a live repository or running verification gates — use qa-execution for that.
Analyzes errors, searches past solutions in memory, provides immediate fixes with code examples, and saves solutions for future reference. Use when user says "debug this", "fix this error", "why is this failing", or when error messages appear like TypeError, ECONNREFUSED, CORS, 404, 500, etc.
Hypothesis-driven autonomous debugging with real command validation
Safe deployment of Polymarket trading bot with regression tests and active trade protection
Generate security fixes from detect-dev findings with regression tests. Use when remediating security vulnerabilities.
Reproduce a bug from a Linear ticket with a failing test. Expects the full ticket context (title, description, comments) to be provided as input.