Loading...
Loading...
Found 38 Skills
Academic writing, research methodology, and scholarly communication workflows. Use when writing papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, conducting research, managing citations, or preparing for peer review. Essential for researchers, graduate students, and academics across disciplines.
Specialized workflows for drafting, refining, and responding to academic literature reviews and peer review feedback. Use this skill for literature review outlines, research-gap synthesis, reviewer rebuttals, response letters, and academic writing tone repair.
Write point-by-point rebuttals to reviewer comments. Extract concerns from reviews, generate evidence-based responses, and format as a structured rebuttal document. Use after receiving peer review feedback.
Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
Revise papers based on reviewer feedback. Map reviewer concerns to specific sections, apply targeted edits, run additional experiments if needed, and verify improvements. Use after receiving peer review with revision requests.
Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning，需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims（先跑 `claims-extractor`）或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta；尽量给出可追溯证据来源（来自稿件/引用/作者陈述）。
Request peer review with proper context and preparation. Structures review requests with clear description of changes and testing status.
Run a decision through 5 AI advisors with different thinking styles, anonymous peer review, and chairman synthesis. For genuine decisions with stakes and tradeoffs — not simple questions. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council.
Unified paper audit skill supporting Chinese & English academic papers. Supports LaTeX (.tex), Typst (.typ), and PDF (.pdf) input formats. Three modes: self-check (pre-submission), review (peer review simulation), gate (quality gate pass/fail). Use when user mentions: audit, review, check paper, paper quality, pre-submission check, score paper, or any paper auditing task, polish paper, deep polish, adversarial review, refine writing.
· Batch-improve skill collections with evaluation loops, lint checks, behavioral tests, peer review. Triggers: 'skill refiner', 'improve skills', 'quality sweep', 'batch improve', 'skill loop'. Not for one skill.