Loading...
Loading...
Found 28 Skills
Run a high-quality decision process and produce a Decision Process Pack (decision brief/pre-read, options + criteria matrix, RAPID/DACI roles, decision meeting plan, decision log entry, comms, review plan). Use for decision making, decision memo, decision log, one-way door vs two-way door, RAPID, DACI, RACI, exec alignment.
This skill is used when users request phrases such as 'handle PR review issues', 'fix review items', 'resolve PR feedback', 'process review issues one by one', 'complete review tasks', 'run pr review resolver', 'resolve PR review', 'address review comments', 'fix review findings', or 'handle code review'. It reads the review comments of the PR associated with the current branch, discusses each unresolved issue with the user one by one, lets the user decide on the handling approach, and executes fixes in parallel as background subtasks.
Guide for recording significant architectural and design decisions in docs/decisions.md. Use this skill when clearly significant architectural decisions are made (database choices, frameworks, core design patterns) or when explicitly asked to document a decision. Be conservative - only suggest for major decisions, not minor implementation details.
Processes meeting notes or transcripts to extract structured information. Use after meetings to quickly generate action items, capture decisions, and create follow-up tasks. Extracts: action items with owners, decisions made, key discussion points, follow-up tasks with priorities.
Expert Architecture Decision Record (ADR) creation and lifecycle management based on Olaf Zimmermann's methodology. Use when creating ADRs, reviewing architectural decisions, evaluating decision readiness, writing MADR templates, assessing decision quality, or managing ADR logs. Covers the full lifecycle from readiness (START criteria) through creation, MADR formatting, completion (ECADR criteria), and ongoing maintenance.
Draft stakeholder updates tailored to audience — executives, engineering, customers, or cross-functional partners. Use when writing weekly status updates, monthly reports, launch announcements, risk communications, or decision documentation.
Document the finalized tech stack selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent records. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four categories: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively trigger after making important choices during feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record the decision", "archive tech selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive proposed solutions under discussion.
Evaluate options for a specific design decision node and recommend one with explicit trade-offs. Use when the design already exposes a concrete choice such as architecture style, state management approach, auth model, storage pattern, sync strategy, multi-agent coordination model, language or runtime, UI framework, data-layer library, or tooling selection. Trigger when the user needs structured comparison and recommendation for a bounded design decision. Do not use for broad design discovery, full-system decomposition, or final readiness review.
[Planning] Validate plan with critical questions interview
Use this skill when facilitating remote team collaboration - async-first workflows, documentation-driven decision making, meeting facilitation, and distributed team communication. Triggers on designing async processes, writing RFCs or decision docs, preparing meeting agendas, running standups or retros, establishing communication norms, reducing meeting load, or improving handoff quality across time zones.
Create, update, review, and reference architecture decision records (ADRs) in the current git repository. Use when the user asks messy design questions, wants a design doc turned into ADR draft(s), needs existing decisions checked before implementation, wants gaps surfaced before writing an ADR, or wants future sessions to reuse decisions consistently. Inspect repository code and docs first, ask only for missing decision-critical information, then produce or update ADR files using the repo’s ADR conventions or the defaults in references/.
Documents the results of a time-boxed technical or design exploration (spike). Use after completing a spike to capture learnings, findings, and recommendations for the team.