Loading...
Loading...
Found 27 Skills
Document the finalized tech stack selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent records. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four categories: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively trigger after making important choices during feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record the decision", "archive tech selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive proposed solutions under discussion.
Evaluate options for a specific design decision node and recommend one with explicit trade-offs. Use when the design already exposes a concrete choice such as architecture style, state management approach, auth model, storage pattern, sync strategy, multi-agent coordination model, language or runtime, UI framework, data-layer library, or tooling selection. Trigger when the user needs structured comparison and recommendation for a bounded design decision. Do not use for broad design discovery, full-system decomposition, or final readiness review.
Expert Architecture Decision Record (ADR) creation and lifecycle management based on Olaf Zimmermann's methodology. Use when creating ADRs, reviewing architectural decisions, evaluating decision readiness, writing MADR templates, assessing decision quality, or managing ADR logs. Covers the full lifecycle from readiness (START criteria) through creation, MADR formatting, completion (ECADR criteria), and ongoing maintenance.
This skill is used when users request phrases such as 'handle PR review issues', 'fix review items', 'resolve PR feedback', 'process review issues one by one', 'complete review tasks', 'run pr review resolver', 'resolve PR review', 'address review comments', 'fix review findings', or 'handle code review'. It reads the review comments of the PR associated with the current branch, discusses each unresolved issue with the user one by one, lets the user decide on the handling approach, and executes fixes in parallel as background subtasks.
Guide for recording significant architectural and design decisions in docs/decisions.md. Use this skill when clearly significant architectural decisions are made (database choices, frameworks, core design patterns) or when explicitly asked to document a decision. Be conservative - only suggest for major decisions, not minor implementation details.
Use when you need to produce a D2 decision document (RFC/Decision Doc) for a Spec Pack, and need to independently decide whether to execute D0 (bypass design via diversion) and D1 (optional research) even under pressure, avoiding guessing FEATURE_DIR, making up input details, writing design as implementation specifics, or leaving behind TODO/To-Confirm lists.
Use this skill when facilitating remote team collaboration - async-first workflows, documentation-driven decision making, meeting facilitation, and distributed team communication. Triggers on designing async processes, writing RFCs or decision docs, preparing meeting agendas, running standups or retros, establishing communication norms, reducing meeting load, or improving handoff quality across time zones.
Resolve implementation ambiguities before planning begins. Two modes: Discussion mode surfaces gray areas with concrete options for greenfield work. Assumptions mode reads the codebase, forms evidence-based opinions, and asks the user to correct only what's wrong (brownfield work). Use for "discuss ambiguities", "resolve gray areas", "clarify before planning", "assumptions mode", "what are the gray areas", "before we plan". Do NOT use for broad design exploration (use feature-design) or for planning itself (use feature-plan).
Create, update, review, and reference architecture decision records (ADRs) in the current git repository. Use when the user asks messy design questions, wants a design doc turned into ADR draft(s), needs existing decisions checked before implementation, wants gaps surfaced before writing an ADR, or wants future sessions to reuse decisions consistently. Inspect repository code and docs first, ask only for missing decision-critical information, then produce or update ADR files using the repo’s ADR conventions or the defaults in references/.
Document architectural decisions. Use when making significant technical decisions that should be recorded. Covers ADR format and decision documentation.
Byzantine consensus voting for multi-agent decision making. Implements voting protocols, conflict resolution, and agreement algorithms for reaching consensus among multiple agents.
[Planning] Validate plan with critical questions interview