Loading...
Loading...
Found 58 Skills
Use when working with comprehensive review full review
Comprehensive Go backend code review with optional parallel agents
Review code for best practices, security issues, and potential bugs. Use when reviewing code changes, checking PRs, analyzing code quality, or performing security audits.
Systematically analyze codebase structure, complexity, dependencies, and architectural patterns to understand project organization
Assist developers in writing clean, maintainable code following software engineering best practices. Use when conducting code reviews, refactoring code, enforcing coding standards, seeking guidance on clean code principles, or integrating automated quality checks into development workflows.
Execute a complete, deterministic, read-only repository audit and produce a single `improvements.md` action plan with traceable findings (file + lines), severity, category, impact, and high-level fixes. Use when users ask for full code audits, security/performance/architecture reviews, file-by-file analysis, or technical debt mapping without modifying project files.
AI-powered systematic codebase analysis. Combines mechanical structure extraction with Claude's semantic understanding to produce documentation that captures not just WHAT code does, but WHY it exists and HOW it fits into the system. Includes pattern recognition, red flag detection, flow tracing, and quality assessment. Use for codebase analysis, documentation generation, architecture understanding, or code review.
Reviews code for quality — architecture conformance, anti-patterns, performance issues, maintainability. Read-only analysis that detects circular dependencies, N+1 queries, dead code, naming violations, and layering breaches. Use when the user asks for a code review, wants feedback on code quality, PR review, tech debt analysis, or architecture conformance checks.
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
Review code for performance: complexity, database/query efficiency, I/O and network cost, memory and allocation behavior, concurrency contention, caching, and latency/throughput regressions. Cognitive-only atomic skill; output is a findings list.
Use the harem hierarchical code review system to output structured review conclusions based on the division of labor among the Empress, Four Consorts, and Nine Imperial Concubines
Coordinates 9 specialized audit workers (security, build, architecture, code quality, dependencies, dead code, observability, concurrency, lifecycle). Researches best practices, delegates parallel audits, aggregates results into single Linear task in Epic 0.