Loading...
Loading...
Found 214 Skills
Use after zanahoria-multi-assumptions has filed N parallel issue variants AND @coderabbitai has responded to all of them — closes the family by extracting the load-bearing assumption, naming a winner, capturing the decision as an ADR, and cleanly closing the rejected variants with cross-referenced reasoning. Triggers on close-the-family, pick-a-winner, commit-the-decision, decide-variants, after-CR-responds, zanahoria-decisions.
Parliamentary procedure as forcing function for genuine deliberation
Phân tích sâu bất kỳ chủ đề nào qua lăng kính Lý thuyết Trò chơi (Game Theory).
Diagnose surprising, negative, unstable, or ambiguous ML/AI experiment results and decide whether to debug implementation, rerun experiments, change metrics or baselines, revise the algorithm, narrow the paper claim, park, or kill a direction. Use this skill whenever results do not match expectations, a method fails, metrics conflict, seeds vary, baselines beat the method, plots look suspicious, or the user asks what to do next after experimental results.
Framework orientation for Layers of Product Design — load this first; provides the context all other skills depend on
Apply Hick's Law to reduce decision time by limiting the number of simultaneous choices presented to users.
Expert methodology for breaking down complex problems into fundamental truths and rebuilding solutions from the ground up. Use when users need breakthrough innovation (not incremental improvement), question industry assumptions, face seemingly impossible problems, want to understand root causes, ask "why does this have to be this way", "rethink from scratch", "reimagine this", request analysis "from first principles", want to challenge conventional wisdom, question everything, or need to deconstruct problems to their core elements. Ideal for strategic decisions, innovation challenges, cost optimization, and escaping local optima.
Use when the user wants a plan validated by @coderabbitai but the right approach is uncertain — file 2-3 parallel issues with the SAME GOAL but deliberately shuffled assumptions/layers/triggers, so CR has comparative material instead of yes/no on a single approach. Triggers on multi-assumptions, multi-framing, parallel plans, comparative plan, dangle-the-carrots.
Continuous follow-up interviews, presenting all questions on the current frontier in each round.
Execute complete FPF cycle from hypothesis generation to decision