Loading...
Loading...
Found 266 Skills
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
Apply Affordance Theory (Gibson, 1979; Norman, 1988) to analyze the action possibilities that an artifact provides to an actor. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate technology design from an affordance perspective, identify why users struggle with an interface, analyze IT-enabled organizational change through affordance actualization, or when they ask 'what does this technology afford', 'why can't users figure out this feature', or 'how does technology enable new practices'.
C-suite orchestration layer that routes founder questions to the right advisor role(s), triggers multi-role board meetings for complex decisions, synthesizes outputs, tracks decisions, and manages cross-functional alignment. Every C-suite interaction starts here. Use when coordinating executive decisions, routing strategic questions, managing board meetings, synthesizing multi-perspective advice, tracking decision history, resolving inter-department conflicts, or when user mentions chief of staff, orchestrator, c-suite coordinator, executive routing, board coordination, decision synthesis, advisor routing, multi-agent coordination, or strategic orchestration.
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. Codex designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective, CC reviews feasibility and implements.
Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building
Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.
Evaluate UI/flows from cognitive load, error prevention, and accessibility perspectives. Apply when reviewing UX, discussing user confusion, high drop-off, or form usability issues.
Analyzes events through indigenous knowledge systems using relational thinking, seven generations principle, reciprocity, holistic integration, and traditional ecological knowledge frameworks. Provides insights on interconnectedness, long-term sustainability, collective wisdom, and decolonial perspectives. Use when: Environmental decisions, resource stewardship, community governance, decolonization, intergenerational planning. Evaluates: Relationships, sustainability, collective impact, indigenous rights, traditional knowledge integration.
Interactive creative thought partner that discovers hidden brilliance in ideas through pattern spotting, paradox hunting, and naming unnamed concepts. Use when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas deeply, develop newsletter content, find unique perspectives, or have a creative thinking session. Triggers on "brainstorm with me", "help me think through...", "explore this idea", "thought partner", "find the insight in...", or "creative session".
Write WeChat Official Account articles from the perspective of an AI product manager. Covers AI product teardowns, scenario-based solutions, efficiency improvement practices, product methodologies, and industry observations. Use this when users say "Write an article about XXX", "Analyze the XXX product", or "Talk about XXX".
This skill is used when users explicitly request "review NSFC proposals", "simulate expert review", or "evaluate NSFC applications". It simulates the perspective of domain experts to conduct multi-dimensional reviews of NSFC proposals, outputting graded issues and actionable modification suggestions. ⚠️ Not applicable: when users only want to write/modify a specific section of a proposal (use the nsfc-*-writer series skills instead), only want to understand review criteria (answer directly), or have no clear "review/evaluate" intent.
Use when Claude Code needs a second opinion, verification, or deeper research on technical matters. This includes researching how a library or API works, confirming implementation approaches, verifying technical assumptions, understanding complex code patterns, or getting alternative perspectives on architectural decisions. The agent leverages the Codex CLI to provide independent analysis and validation.