Loading...
Loading...
Found 2,897 Skills
Issue Workflow Stage 3——Fix code precisely based on confirmed root cause and solution, verify the effect, and document it in {slug}-fix-note.md. This is the final stage of the issue workflow—no verification loop means the workflow is incomplete. Two entry points: the standard path is triggered from easysdd-issue-analyze (with existing {slug}-analysis.md), and the quick path is triggered directly from easysdd-issue-report (without {slug}-analysis.md, as the root cause was determined by AI reading code during the report stage). Trigger scenarios: user says 'Start fixing the bug', 'Fix according to analysis', 'Start modifying code'. During repair, only modify the files stated in the solution; do not optimize casually or introduce new abstractions—these actions will make the scope spread to untraceable levels.
Real-time Hong Kong stock market query. Batch obtain real-time quotes of HKEX securities. Triggered when users ask about "Tencent real-time price", "Hong Kong stock real-time market", "HK quote", "HKEX current price".
Real-time A-share market quote inquiry. Batch obtain real-time securities quotes from Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing Stock Exchanges. Triggered when users ask about "Moutai real-time price", "Shanghai-Shenzhen real-time market", "A-share quotes", "current stock price".
This skill should be used when the user asks to "write an experiment report", "summarize experimental results", "do experiment retrospection", "write a results report", "写实验总结报告", "写实验复盘", or mentions turning completed experiment artifacts into a structured, decision-oriented research report. It assumes strict analysis should come from `results-analysis` first.
On task completion, pair "what failed first" with "what finally worked" and codify the should-have-known-it insight as an ast-grep rule, skill, or CLAUDE.md rule. Use after trial-and-error solutions to spare future-you (or another agent) the same trap. Trigger phrases: "codify today's lessons," "make it a skill," "drop it into lint."
Draft, restructure, or plan Nature-style manuscript sections from author-provided claims, results, figures, notes, or Chinese drafts. Use when the user wants to write or rebuild an abstract, introduction, results narrative, discussion, conclusion, title, or full manuscript argument rather than only polish finished prose.
Generates a structured Bug Fix Brief (BFB) to document issue corrections. Includes root cause analysis, repro steps, fix options, and fix checklist. Use when user asks to create a BFB, document a bug fix, or generate a bug correction document.
Used for all interaction with RevenueCat not covered by a different skill
When a GDD is revised, scans all ADRs and the traceability index to identify which architectural decisions are now potentially stale. Produces a change impact report and guides the user through resolution.
Write a service catalog entry for a microservice or internal platform service — covering service identity, purpose, architecture context, SLAs, API contract summary, data classification, dependencies, operational runbooks, and known limitations. Use when asked to document a service for an internal developer portal, write a service README for a platform catalog, create a service overview page, or onboard a new service to a service registry. Produces a complete service catalog entry suitable for an internal developer portal or wiki.
Generate structured planning docs for web projects with context-safe phases, verification criteria, and exit conditions. Creates IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md plus conditional docs. Use when: starting new projects, adding major features, or breaking large work into manageable phases.
Clear description of what this skill does and when to use it