Loading...
Loading...
Found 693 Skills
Converts agent definitions between Markdown (with YAML frontmatter) and TOML formats. Use when transforming agent configurations for different agent systems — MD format for rich tool restrictions, TOML format for Codex-style agents with sandbox modes.
Multi-path parallel product analysis with cross-model test-time compute scaling. Spawns parallel agents (Claude Code agent teams + Codex CLI) to explore product from multiple perspectives, then synthesizes findings into actionable optimization plans. Can invoke competitors-analysis for competitive benchmarking. Use when "product audit", "self-review", "发布前审查", "产品分析", "analyze our product", "UX audit", or "信息架构审计".
Probes CLI agents (Codex, Gemini) and writes docs/environment_state.json — agent availability config for Phase 0
Sync skills (symlinks) and MCP settings from Claude to Gemini CLI and Codex CLI
Validates Stories/Tasks or context via parallel multi-agent review (Codex + Gemini). Merges findings, debates, applies fixes. GO/NO-GO verdict.
Set up Symphony (OpenAI's Codex orchestrator) for a user's repo. Use when the user mentions Symphony setup, configuring Symphony, getting Symphony running, or wants to connect their repo to Linear for autonomous Codex agents. Also use when the user says "set up symphony", "configure symphony for my repo", or references WORKFLOW.md configuration.
OpenAgents desktop pane and CAD control for Codex via openagents.* tool calls.
Use when the user says "/plan-execute", "plan execute", "implement plan", or "execute plan" and provides a finalized plan file path to carry out. Claude orchestrates, Codex writes code, Claude reviews, and Codex fixes issues until the quality bar is met.
Use when the user says "/plan-review", "plan review", or "PRD review" and provides a plan file path that needs critical review and iterative refinement with Codex.
Validates optimization plan via parallel multi-agent review (Codex + Gemini) before execution. GO/NO-GO verdict.
Analyze a project's past Codex sessions, memory files, and existing local skills to recommend the highest-value skills to create or update. Use when a user asks what skills a project needs, wants skill ideas grounded in real project history, wants an audit of current project-local skills, or wants recommendations for updating stale or incomplete skills instead of creating duplicates.
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".