Loading...
Loading...
Found 173 Skills
Validate code quality, test coverage, performance, and security. Use when verifying implemented features meet all standards and requirements before marking complete.
Review PyTorch pull requests for code quality, test coverage, security, and backward compatibility. Use when reviewing PRs, when asked to review code changes, or when the user mentions "review PR", "code review", or "check this PR".
Diagnose the health of a nao context at any stage of its lifecycle. Use when the user wants a structured review of what's been synced, how RULES.md compares to the target structure, whether every table is documented, whether the data model is MECE, whether tests exist and what their failures reveal, and whether context files are bloated. Outputs a structured audit report with ranked recommendations. Do not use for first-time setup (setup-context) or routine rule writing (write-context-rules).
Use when the user asks to review pull requests, analyze code changes, check for security issues in PRs, or assess code quality of diffs.
Run the critical path smoke test gate before QA hand-off. Executes the automated test suite, verifies core functionality, and produces a PASS/FAIL report. Run after a sprint's stories are implemented and before manual QA begins. A failed smoke check means the build is not ready for QA.
Safely change and test untested codebases using Feathers' "Working Effectively with Legacy Code". Use when the user mentions "legacy code", "no tests", "untested codebase", "how do I test this", "seams", "characterization tests", "golden master", "sprout method", "afraid to change this code", "monster method", "dependency breaking", or "inherited a messy codebase". Also trigger when changing code without tests safely, getting a class under test when constructors, statics, or singletons block it, adding features to tangled modules, or planning incremental test coverage for an old codebase. Covers the legacy-code change algorithm, seams, characterization tests, sprout/wrap, and dependency-breaking techniques. For refactoring code that already has tests, see refactoring-patterns. For day-to-day code quality, see clean-code.
Use after QA strategy and test-case synthesis to build the requirements-to-test traceability matrix, identify missing coverage and test blockers, and score readiness for QA execution. Supports `--quick-flow` for fast assumption-driven execution and `--full-flow` for question-driven verified execution. Explicit full or end-to-end spec refinement requests continue through the existing 18-stage refinement cascade.
Run Go quality checks via make check with intelligent error categorization and actionable fix suggestions. Use when user requests "run quality checks", "check PR quality", "verify code quality", or "run make check". Use before creating commits or during PR review. Do NOT use for non-Go repositories, repositories without a Makefile, or manual linter invocation.
Review test quality and audit test coverage for any module. This skill should be used when reviewing existing tests, auditing test gaps, writing new tests, or when asked to assess test health. It pipelines testing standards into the audit workflow to produce a prioritized gap report. The output is a report, not code — do not write test implementations until the report is reviewed.
Refactor MoonBit code to be idiomatic: shrink public APIs, convert functions to methods, use pattern matching with views, add loop invariants, and ensure test coverage without regressions. Use when updating MoonBit packages or refactoring MoonBit APIs, modules, or tests.
Use when the user asks for tests, mentions TDD, or when new code has been written and needs test coverage.
Harden the test surface after `/cook` — map changed behavior to tests, find weak assertions and missing boundaries, and add focused hardening tests. Use when the user wants the tests strengthened before review or shipping — phrases like "press the changes", "harden this", "check coverage", "strengthen the tests", "are the tests good enough", "press before /age", "/press". Use even when the user wants to "tighten things up" before review. Do NOT use to add broad new behavior — only corrective fixes that hardening tests force.