Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,906 Skills
Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?", "why does everything depend on everything?", "are our layers correct?", "where should this code live?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Also triggers when user mentions: dependency inversion / hexagonal architecture / bounded contexts / circular imports / tangled dependencies / module coupling / package structure / spaghetti code / directory layout. Use this skill proactively when project structure, module boundaries, or architectural decisions are discussed — even without the word "audit". Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.
Build and maintain an LLM-curated personal knowledge base — the "LLM Wiki" pattern from Andrej Karpathy's April 2026 gist. Use this skill whenever the user wants to ingest a source (paper, article, transcript, PDF, notes) into a persistent compounding knowledge base, ask a question against accumulated notes, lint or audit such a base, or initialize a new one. Trigger on phrases like "add this to my wiki", "ingest this paper", "compile this into the knowledge base", "what does my wiki say about X", "lint the wiki", "build a knowledge base from these documents", "research notes", "second brain", "personal knowledge base", or any reference to LLM Wiki / OmegaWiki. Trigger even when the user does not say "wiki" — if they are accumulating sources over time and want them organized, this applies. The skill scales — sharded indexes, atomic pages, YAML frontmatter, and a bundled search script keep the wiki from becoming a context bottleneck at hundreds or thousands of pages.
Local pentest sandbox for a full black-box engagement. Triggers on "kage", "pentest", "security audit on", "audit the security of". Runs recon, deep testing, exploit verification, and judging inside a per-engagement Kali Docker container. Each host working directory gets its own isolated sandbox. Produces `./results/<target>/audit-report.md`.
Analyze Sentry session replays to surface UX patterns, pain points, and user journeys for a given product area. Use when asked to "show me how users use", "day in the life", "UX research", "replay research", "how do customers use", "what's the user experience like for", "watch replays of", "analyze replays for", "user behavior on", or "replay UX audit" for any Sentry product surface.
Richard Feynman's Integrity Audit applied to any analysis, business plan, or decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Source Auditor, Self-Deception Hunter, Translation Tester, Cargo Cult Inspector, Confidence Inverter — who each apply a distinct lens from Feynman's framework to detect dishonesty, self-deception, and cargo cult reasoning. The lead synthesizes into a verdict: is this analysis honest, or is it fooling itself? Use when the user says "feynman this", "integrity audit", "is this honest", "am I fooling myself", "cargo cult check", or wants to stress-test any analysis, plan, or claim before trusting it. Works standalone or as a meta-audit after /munger or /thiel.
Review experimental results, plots, tables, and figures before they are shown in a meeting, paper, report, or presentation. Use this skill whenever the user wants to present results, check a figure, interpret experiment plots, prepare result slides, validate captions, audit axes/legends/error bars, or make sure results are connected to hypotheses and experimental setup.
Single-page SEO audit: deep content quality evaluation using Google's E-E-A-T framework, Helpful Content guidelines, on-page SEO factors, search intent alignment, technical signals, and readability analysis. Fetches GSC performance data for that specific page, crawls the live HTML, evaluates metadata, schema markup, internal linking, content depth, and produces a scored report with actionable fixes. Use this skill whenever the user wants to analyze a specific page or URL — not the whole site. Trigger on: "analyze this page", "audit this URL", "how is this page doing", "evaluate my blog post", "check this landing page", "page SEO", "content quality check", "is this page good enough", "review this page's SEO", "what's wrong with this page", "how can I improve this page", "page analysis", "single page audit", "content audit for [URL]", or any request that names a specific URL/page for SEO evaluation. If the user provides a specific URL (not just a domain), this is likely the right skill — use /seo-analysis for full-site audits instead.
Bootstrap a nao agent for a project — gather warehouse + scope + extra-context info in one round, look up the warehouse-specific config from nao docs, write nao_config.yaml, run nao init + nao sync, set up the LLM key, and generate the first RULES.md. Use when the user has just decided to use nao on a new project. Only for first-time setup; for editing rules, generating tests, or reviewing an existing context, use write-context-rules / create-context-tests / audit-context.
Audit a python-pptx export against its source HTML deck, identify layout/content drift (footer overflow, cropped content, missing italic/em, lost styling, off-rhythm spacing), and re-export with strict footer-rail + cursor-flow layout discipline. Use this skill whenever the user has a .pptx that was generated from an HTML slide deck and asks to compare/audit/verify/fix the export — including phrases like "compare ppt with html", "fidelity audit", "fix the pptx", "ppt is cut off", "footer overlap", "italic missing in pptx", "re-export the deck", "pptx-html-fidelity-audit", or any case where a python-pptx → HTML round-trip needs verification or repair. Also trigger when the user shows you a deck.html and a deck.pptx side by side and is debugging visual differences.
Meta Ads (Facebook + Instagram) account audit and business context setup. Run this first — it gathers business information, analyzes account health, and saves context that all other Meta ads skills reuse. Trigger on "audit my Meta ads", "audit my Facebook ads", "Meta ads audit", "set up my Meta ads", "onboard Meta", "Meta account overview", "how's my Meta account", "Meta health check", "what should I fix in my Facebook ads", or when the user is new to NotFair Meta and hasn't run an audit before. Also trigger proactively when other Meta ads skills detect that meta business-context.json is missing.
Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.
Recursive tech-audit & decision-tree mapping. Use when the user wants to break down a requirement, audit a tech stack, map dependencies, or plan an implementation.