Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,472 Skills
Build and maintain project-specific review policy for `agentic-review` by combining repository docs (`AGENTS.md`, `ENGINEERING.md`, `CONTEXT.md`/`CONTEXT-MAP.md`, ADRs), repository-mined conventions, and structured user input, then writing machine-usable policy files under `<docs-dir>/review/policies/`, including audit-governance metadata consumed by `agentic-review`. Use when the user wants architecture integrity checks (onion/clean/hexagonal), module-specific review rules, dependency-direction policy, naming/inheritance convention enforcement, stricter project/domain review standards, or explicit auditability requirements for specialist review coverage.
Intelligent Bid Document Writing Expert, specializing in preparing bid documents in the fields of engineering consulting, architectural design, and municipal engineering. This skill is activated when users mention terms such as: bid document, tender, bidding, bid proposal, technical bid, commercial bid, bid response, bidding plan, bid document, bid proposal, tender, proposal writing, bid document preparation, bid writing, tender document analysis, scoring standard optimization.
Determine when a product, platform, or communication crosses the regulatory line from education into investment advice requiring registration. Use when the user asks about the definition of investment advice under the Advisers Act, whether a fintech feature or AI chatbot constitutes advice, the publisher's exclusion for newsletters or model portfolios, broker-dealer solely incidental exclusion, what triggers a 'recommendation' under Reg BI, or DOL education vs advice safe harbors. Also trigger when users ask 'do I need to register as an investment adviser', 'does this app give investment advice', 'is this tool just education or advice', 'robo-adviser registration', or 'disclaimer language for financial content'.
Add policy enforcement, zero-trust identity, and execution sandboxing to AI agents with Microsoft's Agent Governance Toolkit
When the user wants to build or improve a sales bot's ability to manage sender reputation and ensure messages get delivered. Also use when the user mentions "deliverability," "spam prevention," "sender reputation," "email warmup," or "domain reputation."
Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions.
Legacy-project style inheritance skill. Use when the user types /inherit-legacy-style, or when onboarding an AI coding agent onto a hand-written legacy project and you need to prevent "style drift" (the model imposing its pretrained mainstream idioms onto the project). Language- and framework-agnostic — it aligns meta-architecture only, not syntax. Once run, it becomes a behavioral constraint on all subsequent coding tasks. Do NOT use for pure research or one-off questions unrelated to code-style alignment.
Designs user experiences, creates wireframes, defines user flows, ensures accessibility. Trigger keywords - UX design, wireframe, user flow, accessibility, WCAG, mobile-first, responsive, UI design, user journey, interface design, user experience, design system, component design, interaction design
Multi-language code quality standards and review for TypeScript, Python, Go, and Rust. Enforces type safety, security, performance, and maintainability. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code. Includes review process, checklist, and Python PEP 8 deep-dive.
Proactive quality guidance system that monitors artifact creation and provides real-time feedback on documentation quality
Framework for documenting compliant patient journeys with touchpoints, consent, and escalation paths.
Use when validating automation builds before launch or after significant changes.