Loading...
Loading...
Found 198 Skills
Provides guidance for automatically evolving and optimizing AI agents across any domain using LLM-driven evolution algorithms. Use when building self-improving agents, optimizing agent prompts and skills against benchmarks, or implementing automated agent evaluation loops.
Prepare a research artifact package for conference artifact evaluation, reproducibility review, badges, supplementary material, or post-acceptance artifact release. Use this skill whenever the user needs install instructions, reviewer-facing reproduction commands, Docker or environment checks, data/checkpoint packaging, hardware/runtime estimates, anonymized or public artifact metadata, artifact evaluation forms, or a claim-to-artifact reproducibility audit for ML/AI venues.
Turn a promising ML/AI research idea into a precise algorithm or method design before implementation. Use this skill whenever the user has an idea or project direction and wants to design the actual method, objective, architecture, inference procedure, assumptions, failure modes, ablations, implementation handoff, or method section plan before coding or experiment design.
Design hypothesis-driven ML/AI experiments before running them. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan experiments, ablations, baselines, metrics, controls, seeds, logging, stop conditions, reviewer-proof evidence, or an experiment matrix for a paper claim before using run-experiment or writing results.
Initialize a full ML research project control root with independent paper, code, and optional slide repositories, shared project memory, root-level agent guidance, code-owned worktree policy, and component handoffs. Use when starting a new research project, setting up a project root for agents, connecting paper/code/slides repos, or replacing a simple paper+code workspace with a lifecycle-aware research project structure.
Diagnose surprising, negative, unstable, or ambiguous ML/AI experiment results and decide whether to debug implementation, rerun experiments, change metrics or baselines, revise the algorithm, narrow the paper claim, park, or kill a direction. Use this skill whenever results do not match expectations, a method fails, metrics conflict, seeds vary, baselines beat the method, plots look suspicious, or the user asks what to do next after experimental results.
Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.
Codex-native Academic Research Skills suite for deep research, academic paper writing, manuscript review, full research-to-paper pipelines, and experiment planning or validation. Use when the user asks for deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, research question refinement, academic paper drafting, paper revision, citation or integrity checks, reviewer simulation, peer review, editorial decision letters, research-to-paper workflows, experiment execution planning, statistical interpretation, or human study protocol support. Also use for Claude-style ARS command aliases such as /ars-plan, ars-plan, /ars-outline, /ars-abstract, /ars-lit-review, /ars-citation-check, /ars-disclosure, /ars-format-convert, /ars-revision-coach, /ars-revision, and /ars-full. This skill vendors ARS role prompts, references, templates, and shared handoff schemas under ars/.
Use when testing, reviewing, pressure-testing, refining, packaging, or validating agent skills for academic research workflows before installing or relying on them.
Use when inspecting, cleaning, understanding, reproducing, or auditing academic research code repositories, especially when README commands, datasets, checkpoints, experiments, or paper claims need verification.
Use when academic research involves human subjects, public web data, platform scraping, sensitive domains, privacy risk, dataset sharing, consent, IRB, licenses, or data retention.
Paper Analyst — Responsible for in-depth paper reading, extracting method details, and building comparison tables. Activated when assigned to analyze papers by research supervisors or literature investigators. Conduct structured analysis on the Top 20 core papers, generate paper analysis cards and cross-paper comparison tables.