Loading...
Loading...
Found 139 Skills
Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for BRD documents - validates link integrity, requirement completeness, strategic alignment, and identifies issues requiring manual attention
Bug-to-test pipeline: reproduce the bug as a failing test first, then fix. The regression test lives forever.
Systematic code analysis with evidence collection
Comprehensive content review and quality assurance for TASKS documents - validates task completeness, SPEC alignment, implementation contracts, and identifies issues requiring manual attention
Respond to PR review comments with critical evaluation. Use when addressing code review feedback, responding to bot review comments (Gemini Code Assist, CodeRabbit, etc.), or handling PR suggestions. Fetches comments, evaluates each against project context, applies valid fixes, declines invalid suggestions with reasoning, and posts responses.
Conduct thorough code reviews with structured feedback on security, performance, architecture, and testing. Generates trackable review documents with prioritized issues (critical/required/suggestions) and educational content. Use when reviewing PRs or code changes. Triggers on "review this code", "code review", "review PR".
Perform systematic self-review of code changes before commits using structured checklist. Validates architecture boundaries, code quality, test coverage, documentation, and project-specific anti-patterns. Use before committing, creating PRs, or when user says "review my changes", "self-review", "check my code". Adapts to Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust projects.
Verify completed implementation against the plan. Checks that all tasks were fully implemented, nothing was forgotten, code compiles, tests pass, and quality standards are met. Use after "/aif-implement" completes, or when user says "verify", "check work", "did we miss anything".
Unvarnished technical criticism combining Linus Torvalds' precision, Gordon Ramsay's standards, and James Bach's BS-detection. Use when code/tests need harsh reality checks, certification schemes smell fishy, or technical decisions lack rigor. No sugar-coating, just surgical truth about what's broken and why.
Write high-quality bug reports that get fixed quickly. Use when reporting bugs, training teams on bug reporting, or establishing bug report standards.
Manage change control for validated computerized systems. Covers change request triage (emergency, standard, minor), impact assessment on validated state, revalidation scope determination, approval workflows, implementation tracking, and post-change verification. Use when a validated system requires a software upgrade, patch, or configuration change; when infrastructure changes affect validated systems; when a CAPA requires system modification; or when emergency changes need expedited approval and retrospective documentation.
10-parallel code/design review using reviewer subagents. Use when: - Running code reviews on PRs, commits, or branches - Running design reviews on issues or documents - Need multi-perspective review (security, architecture, code, QA, historian)