Loading...
Loading...
Found 214 Skills
OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis.
Use historical analogies to inform strategic decisions by identifying structural similarities and differences between past and present situations. Use this skill when the user draws on historical precedent to justify a strategy, needs to evaluate whether a historical comparison is valid, or wants to learn from past events — even if they say 'this is like the dotcom bubble', 'history repeats itself', or 'what can we learn from how X handled this'.
Execute complete FPF cycle from hypothesis generation to decision
Forces adversarial reasoning before committing to decisions. Triggers on architectural choices, approach selection, and planning phases to prevent premature commitment bias.
Help users run more effective meetings. Use when someone is dealing with meeting overload, wants to improve meeting culture, is preparing an important meeting, or struggles to get decisions made in meetings.
Structured clarification before decisions. Use when user is in PLANNING mode, explicitly asks to plan or discuss, or when agent faces choices requiring user input. Ensures agent asks questions instead of making autonomous decisions when multiple valid approaches exist or context is missing.
Pre-mortem analysis that imagines a plan has failed, then works backward to identify causes and preventions. Use before launches, major decisions, or risky initiatives to surface hidden risks.
Help users develop product taste and intuition. Use when someone wants to improve their product judgment, struggles to evaluate design quality, needs to make decisions without complete data, or wants to build better product instincts.
Help users make better decisions between competing options. Use when someone is weighing pros and cons, comparing alternatives, struggling with a difficult choice, deciding between speed and quality, or asking "should we do X or Y?"
Walk through decisions using a 3-part framework (first-principles, cost/benefit, second-order effects). Use when choosing between options, evaluating trade-offs, or making high-stakes decisions.
Run a Virtual Think Tank — a structured multi-persona debate — before planning or making architectural/design/strategic decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is about to plan a system, make a technology choice, evaluate trade-offs, decide on an approach, or faces any decision where multiple perspectives would sharpen the outcome. Also trigger when the user says "think tank", "debate this", "perspectives on", "trade-offs", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "before we plan", or asks for pros/cons of competing approaches. This skill should run BEFORE any implementation planning begins — it produces a structured analysis that feeds into better plans.
Use when you need to generate many creative options before systematically narrowing to the best choices. Invoke when exploring product ideas, solving open-ended problems, generating strategic alternatives, developing research questions, designing experiments, or when you need both breadth (many ideas) and rigor (principled selection). Use when user mentions brainstorming, ideation, divergent thinking, generating options, or evaluating alternatives.