Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,008 Skills
Perform automated code reviews on GitLab merge requests. Analyzes code for style, bugs, security, performance, and error handling issues. Generates HTML report for easy reading.
Effectue des revues de code complètes des merge requests GitLab, analysant la qualité du code, la sécurité, les performances et les bonnes pratiques. À utiliser quand l'utilisateur dit « review » ou « code review » ou demande de revoir des merge requests ou d'analyser les changements d'une branche avant fusion.
Structured code review using tiered persona agents, confidence-gated findings, and a merge/dedup pipeline. Use when reviewing code changes before creating a PR.
Workflow-first code review for bugs, regressions, risky behavior changes, and missing tests. USE when reviewing diffs, PRs, or proposed implementations.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Ensures consistent, constructive, and thorough code reviews across teams.
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREMELY CRITICAL 6-pass analysis identifying runtime failures, code consistency issues, architectural problems, environment compatibility risks, and verification strategies. Posts structured review as GitHub PR comment. Use when user asks to "review PR", "review this code", "review changes", "check this PR", "analyze PR", "post review", or for Phase 3 of devflow. Supports parallel review mode with multiplier (code-review-3, code-review 6X) for consensus-based reviews. This is an ultra-critical reviewer that does not let things slip and desires only perfection.
Perform code reviews following best practices from Code Smells and The Pragmatic Programmer. Use when asked to "review this code", "check for code smells", "review my PR", "audit the codebase", or need quality feedback on code changes. Supports both full codebase audits and focused PR/diff reviews. Outputs structured markdown reports grouped by severity.
Reviews pull requests and code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use when user asks for code review, PR review, or mentions reviewing changes.
Perform automated code reviews with best practices, security checks, and refactoring suggestions. Use when reviewing code, checking for vulnerabilities, or analyzing code quality.
Structured code review covering style, readability, and security concerns with actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests or merge requests to identify issues and suggest improvements.
Provides automated, context-aware code reviews focusing on logic errors and style violations. Use during Pull Request cycles to identify potential bugs and maintain high code quality standards.
Perform blunt, high-intensity code review in Ukrainian with a colloquial style inspired by Oleksandr Povoroznyuk. Use when users explicitly ask for a harsh/rough tone, slang-heavy feedback, or review comments "in style of Поворознюк", including optional profanity. Keep findings technically precise, actionable, and evidence-based.