Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,565 Skills
Use this agent when you need to verify that a UI implementation matches its Figma design specifications. This agent should be called after code has been written to implement a design, particularly after HTML/CSS/React components have been created or modified. The agent will visually compare the live implementation against the Figma design and provide detailed feedback on discrepancies.\n\nExamples:\n- <example>\n Context: The user has just implemented a new component based on a Figma design.\n user: "I've finished implementing the hero section based on the Figma design"\n assistant: "I'll review how well your implementation matches the Figma design."\n <commentary>\n Since UI implementation has been completed, use the design-implementation-reviewer agent to compare the live version with Figma.\n </commentary>\n </example>\n- <example>\n Context: After the general code agent has implemented design changes.\n user: "Update the button styles to match the new design system"\n assistant: "I've updated the butto...
Design packaging, pricing strategy, and value communication. Bridges GTM (CMO) and Finance (CFO).
Use this agent when you need a final review pass to ensure code changes are as simple and minimal as possible. This agent should be invoked after implementation is complete but before finalizing changes, to identify opportunities for simplification, remove unnecessary complexity, and ensure adherence to YAGNI principles. Examples: <example>Context: The user has just implemented a new feature and wants to ensure it's as simple as possible. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system" assistant: "Great! Let me review the implementation for simplicity and minimalism using the code-simplicity-reviewer agent" <commentary>Since implementation is complete, use the code-simplicity-reviewer agent to identify simplification opportunities.</commentary></example> <example>Context: The user has written complex business logic and wants to simplify it. user: "I think this order processing logic might be overly complex" assistant: "I'll use the code-simplicity-reviewer agent to analyze the complexity...
Use this agent when you need to perform security audits, vulnerability assessments, or security reviews of code. This includes checking for common security vulnerabilities, validating input handling, reviewing authentication/authorization implementations, scanning for hardcoded secrets, and ensuring OWASP compliance. <example>Context: The user wants to ensure their newly implemented API endpoints are secure before deployment.\nuser: "I've just finished implementing the user authentication endpoints. Can you check them for security issues?"\nassistant: "I'll use the security-sentinel agent to perform a comprehensive security review of your authentication endpoints."\n<commentary>Since the user is asking for a security review of authentication code, use the security-sentinel agent to scan for vulnerabilities and ensure secure implementation.</commentary></example> <example>Context: The user is concerned about potential SQL injection vulnerabilities in their database queries.\nuser: "I'm worried about SQL inj...
Use this agent when you need to understand the historical context and evolution of code changes, trace the origins of specific code patterns, identify key contributors and their expertise areas, or analyze patterns in commit history. This agent excels at archaeological analysis of git repositories to provide insights about code evolution and development patterns. <example>Context: The user wants to understand the history and evolution of recently modified files.\nuser: "I've just refactored the authentication module. Can you analyze the historical context?"\nassistant: "I'll use the git-history-analyzer agent to examine the evolution of the authentication module files."\n<commentary>Since the user wants historical context about code changes, use the git-history-analyzer agent to trace file evolution, identify contributors, and extract patterns from the git history.</commentary></example> <example>Context: The user needs to understand why certain code patterns exist.\nuser: "Why does this payment processing...
Expert methodology for breaking down complex problems into fundamental truths and rebuilding solutions from the ground up. Use when users need breakthrough innovation (not incremental improvement), question industry assumptions, face seemingly impossible problems, want to understand root causes, ask "why does this have to be this way", "rethink from scratch", "reimagine this", request analysis "from first principles", want to challenge conventional wisdom, question everything, or need to deconstruct problems to their core elements. Ideal for strategic decisions, innovation challenges, cost optimization, and escaping local optima.
Use this agent when you need to review JavaScript or Stimulus frontend code changes with a special eye for race conditions. The agent should be invoked after implementing JavaScript features, modifying existing JavaScript code, or when creating or modifying Stimulus controllers. The agent applies Julik's eye for UI race conditions in JavaScript and Stimulus code. Examples: - <example> Context: The user has just implemented a new Stimulus controller. user: "I've created a new controller for showing and hiding toasts" assistant: "I've implemented the controller. Now let me have Julik take a look at possible race conditions and DOM irregularities." <commentary> Since new Stimulus controller code was written, use the julik-frontend-races-reviewer agent to apply Julik's uncanny knowledge of UI data races and quality checks in JavaScript and Stimulus code. </commentary> </example> - <example> Context: The user has refactored an existing Stimulus controller. user: "Please refactor the controller to slowly animate...
Use BEFORE and AFTER running trading engine simulations. Helps with: (1) SETUP - choosing configs, selecting segments via segment collections, batch sizing (recommend 2,000-3,000 runs); (2) EXECUTION - running batch simulations with --collection; (3) ANALYSIS - comprehensive diagnostics after runs. Triggers on: 'run simulations', 'test configs', 'batch simulation', 'analyze sim results', 'which configs to test', 'how many segments', 'simulation setup'.
Use when designing or building modern web applications in JavaScript/TypeScript (SPA/SSR/SSG/ISR/RSC): architecture trade-offs, state/data patterns, performance, testing, delivery, and team scaling.
Australian business English writing style for professional communications. Warm, direct, EN-AU spelling. Use when writing emails, chat messages, proposals, client communications, or any business writing for Australian SME audiences. Applies to drafting, editing, and tone-checking any professional text.
Sets up new projects or improves existing projects with development best practices, tooling, documentation, and workflow automation. Use when user wants to start a new project, improve project structure, add development tooling, or establish professional workflows.
Helps beginners find their first AGENTIC project through pain point identification. Guides through questioning, analysis, project suggestion, and folder setup. Use when someone asks 'what project should I build?' or 'help me get started with Claude Code'.