Loading...
Loading...
Found 2,070 Skills
Use this skill when designing help center architecture, writing support articles, or optimizing search and self-service. Triggers on knowledge base, help center, support articles, self-service, article templates, search optimization, content taxonomy, and any task requiring help documentation design or management.
Analyze codebases from the bottom up and generate a hierarchical README.md document tree. Start analysis from leaf directories, generate README.md files for each directory containing one-sentence descriptions of files, classes, and functions, and summarize layer by layer upwards to form a complete codebase documentation system. Supports state persistence and resumable analysis, suitable for scenarios such as understanding new projects, generating technical documentation, and analyzing code structures. Use this skill when you need to understand codebase structures, analyze function implementations, or generate code documentation.
Design help systems and support patterns that work for people with cognitive disabilities. Use when designing help content, tooltips, onboarding, FAQs, support flows, documentation, or any context where users need guidance. Triggers on: help, support, FAQ, tooltip, onboarding, tutorial, guidance, stuck, confused, documentation, instructions.
SPARC development workflow: Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion. A structured approach for complex implementations that ensures thorough planning before coding. Use when: new feature implementation, complex implementations, architectural changes, system redesign, integration work, unclear requirements. Skip when: simple bug fixes, documentation updates, configuration changes, well-defined small tasks, routine maintenance.
Search DuckDB and DuckLake documentation and blog posts. Returns relevant doc chunks for a question or keyword using full-text search against a locally cached index.
Query and sync YApi interface documentation. Use when user mentions "yapi 接口文档", YAPI docs, asks for request/response details, or needs docs sync. Also triggers when user pastes a YApi URL that matches the configured base_url.
Review the current conversation and propose structured improvements to skills, documentation, and agent rules.
Execute a lightweight ad-hoc task (debugging, documentation, small adjustments) without the full change lifecycle. Assesses spec impact afterward.
Conduct a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework with explicit search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment, and transparent synthesis. Use this skill when the user needs to design a reproducible literature search, apply PRISMA flow documentation, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, assess study quality, or when they ask 'how do I do a systematic review', 'what is PRISMA', or 'how do I make my literature review reproducible'.
Catlass Operator End-to-End Development Orchestrator. Based on ascend-kernel (csrc/ops), it connects catlass design, catlass-operator-code-gen and ascendc sub-skills to complete the closed loop from project initialization to documentation, precision, and performance. Keywords: Catlass, end-to-end, ascend-kernel, operator development, workflow orchestration.
Umbrella skill for agent work discipline across development, analysis, and documentation: inspect the repo before restructuring, keep durable truth in repo artifacts instead of chat memory, co-evolve specs/design/steering/user docs with code, apply sound coding patterns, verify work honestly, avoid shortcuts, work efficiently with subagents without hallucinating, and keep moving through the next concrete work item when the human is away. References cover coding patterns, AI-authored code review, and artifact co-evolution. Trigger when the user asks for workflow discipline, coding patterns, doc/artifact maintenance, code review of AI-authored code, project hygiene, execution guardrails, repo normalization, or when a task risks drifting across architecture, storage, specs, continuity, or tooling boundaries.
Ultra-lightweight channel for refactor processes - used when changes are obviously too small to justify the full scan → design → apply three-stage workflow. AI directly identifies 1-3 low-risk optimization points, confirms with the user once, modifies in-place using classic methods, and validates itself by running tests. No scan checklist, no design documentation, no multi-step HUMAN verification required. Trigger scenarios: When the user says "quick refactor", "small refactor", "simply optimize XX function", "modify directly", "skip all those steps", and the scope of changes is clearly limited to a single function/single component, with tests available for self-validation.