Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,008 Skills
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review my changes", "review this code", "check my work", "what's wrong with my changes", "review before I push", "security review", "do a code review", or mentions reviewing, auditing, or analyzing local code changes before committing or opening a PR.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or standardizing review practices.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review code", "code review", "check my code", "audit code", "find bugs", "security review", "performance review", or any ServiceNow code quality assessment.
Reviews Phoenix LiveView code for lifecycle patterns, assigns/streams usage, components, and security. Use when reviewing LiveView modules, .heex templates, or LiveComponents.
Get git records for specified users and days, perform code review for each commit, and generate detailed code review reports
Use when receiving code review feedback, processing PR comments, or needing to evaluate suggestions before implementing - requires technical verification not blind agreement
Code review skill for analyzing code quality, detecting bugs, and ensuring best practices. Provides comprehensive code review with actionable feedback. Use proactively when user requests code review, quality check, or bug detection. Triggers: code review, review code, check code, analyze code, bug detection, 코드 리뷰, 코드 검토, 버그 검사, コードレビュー, バグ検出, 代码审查, 代码检查, revisión de código, revisar código, detección de errores, revue de code, réviser le code, détection de bugs, Code-Review, Code überprüfen, Fehlererkennung, revisione del codice, rivedere codice, rilevamento bug Do NOT use for: design document creation, deployment tasks, or gap analysis (use phase-8-review).
Review backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules. Use when the user requests a review, analysis, or improvement of backend files (e.g., `.py`) under the `api/` directory. Do NOT use for frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Supports pending-change review, code snippets review, and file-focused review.
Provides comprehensive code review capability for React applications, validates component architecture, hooks usage, React 19 patterns, state management, performance optimization, accessibility compliance, and TypeScript integration. Use when reviewing React code changes, before merging pull requests, after implementing new features, or for component architecture validation. Triggers on "review React code", "React code review", "check my React components".
Provides comprehensive code review capability for NestJS applications, analyzing controllers, services, modules, guards, interceptors, pipes, dependency injection, and database integration patterns. Use when reviewing NestJS code changes, before merging pull requests, after implementing new features, or for architecture validation. Triggers on "review NestJS code", "NestJS code review", "check my NestJS controller/service".
Comprehensive review of local uncommitted changes using specialized agents with code improvement suggestions
Comprehensive code review checklist for Go projects. Evaluates code quality, idiomatic patterns, error handling, naming, package structure, and test coverage. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or before merging changes. Trigger examples: "review this code", "check this PR", "code review", "review Go file". Do NOT use for security-specific audits (use go-security-audit) or performance-specific analysis (use go-performance-review).