Loading...
Loading...
Found 318 Skills
Guides senior system and solution architecture—cross-service boundaries, integration patterns, non-functional requirements (scale, reliability, security, cost), ADRs, C4-style modeling, architecture review, build-vs-buy, and phased migration (strangler, dual-write). Use when designing multi-service systems, evaluating platform or vendor choices, writing or reviewing architecture decision records, defining standards and principles, or assessing technical risk across domains—not for single-service RFCs and module design (senior-software-engineer), data platform or mesh decisions (data-architect), cloud landing zone, Well-Architected, and migration architecture (cloud-architect), cloud/IaC implementation (infrastructure-engineer, cloud-engineer), internal developer platform product (platform-engineer), or program tracking (technical-program-manager). For business strategy and cases, use business-consultant; for applied AI (RAG, agents, copilots), use applied-ai-architect-commercial-enterprise.
Guardião da arquitetura de software no SynkOS. Use esta skill quando o usuário pedir para propor ou revisar a arquitetura de um sistema, avaliar tradeoffs entre tecnologias ou abordagens, criar um ADR (Architecture Decision Record), desenhar um modelo de dados ou contrato de API, ou fazer perguntas como "qual stack usar para X?", "como estruturar esse serviço?", "quais são os tradeoffs de Y vs Z?", "documente as decisões técnicas", "revise essa arquitetura". Ative também para discovery brownfield (entender o que já existe antes de propor mudanças), para cross-cutting concerns como segurança e performance, e para revisar designs propostos pelas equipes de implementação.
Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.
This skill should be used when the user provides a strategy, plan, or decision document and wants to surface hidden assumptions and blind spots using the Known/Unknown 4-quadrant framework. Trigger on "known unknown", "4분면 분석", "blind spots", "뭘 놓치고 있지", "뭘 모르는지 모르겠어", "전략 점검", "전략 분석", "assumption check", "가정 점검", "quadrant analysis", "what am I missing". Strategy-level blind spot analysis with hypothesis-driven questioning. For requirement clarification use vague; for content-vs-form reframing use metamedium.
Document the finalized tech stack selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent records. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four categories: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively trigger after making important choices during feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record the decision", "archive tech selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive proposed solutions under discussion.
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is story X ready to implement'.
Use after zanahoria-multi-assumptions has filed N parallel issue variants AND @coderabbitai has responded to all of them — closes the family by extracting the load-bearing assumption, naming a winner, capturing the decision as an ADR, and cleanly closing the rejected variants with cross-referenced reasoning. Triggers on close-the-family, pick-a-winner, commit-the-decision, decide-variants, after-CR-responds, zanahoria-decisions.
Crea documentos técnicos organizados en /docs (specs, planes, ADRs, referencias). Usa cuando el usuario diga "crear documento", "escribir spec", "documentar esto", "creame una spec", "escribime documentación", "hacer documentación", o quiera agregar documentación al proyecto.
This skill should be used when engineering decisions are being made during code implementation. The Archivist enforces decision documentation as a standard practice, ensuring every engineering choice includes rationale and integrates with Architecture Decision Records (ADRs). Use when writing code that involves choosing between alternatives, selecting technologies, designing architectures, or making trade-offs.
Guides PRD, ADR, Design Doc, and Work Plan creation with templates and decision matrix.
Document finalized technology selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent documents. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four types: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively push when important choices are made after feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record decision", "archive technology selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive under-discussion solutions.
Use this skill when > Design review session that stress-tests plans against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallize. Use when validating architecture or plans against a project's language and documented decisions.