Loading...
Loading...
Found 2,219 Skills
Turborepo monorepo architecture decisions and anti-patterns. Use when: (1) choosing between monorepo vs polyrepo, (2) deciding when to split packages, (3) debugging cache misses, (4) setting package boundaries, (5) avoiding circular dependencies. NOT for CLI syntax (see turbo --help). Focuses on architectural decisions that prevent monorepo sprawl and maintenance nightmares. Triggers: turborepo, monorepo, package boundaries, when to split packages, turbo cache miss, circular dependency, workspace organization, task dependencies.
PROACTIVELY build backend APIs with Node.js/TypeScript and Go. Use when designing APIs, implementing auth, or building microservices. Applies Clean Architecture, SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, KISS principles.
Guide for quality focused software architecture. This skill should be used when users want to write code, design architecture, analyze code, in any case that relates to software development.
Generates project context (code structure + architecture intent). Use when starting sessions, understanding codebase structure, onboarding to a project, after major refactoring, or delegating complex work to agents.
Validate Architecture Decision Records (ADR) against Layer 5 schema standards
Analyzes code based on John Ousterhout's "A Philosophy of Software Design". Identifies unnecessary complexity, shallow modules, information leaks, and design problems. Use when reviewing architecture, PRs, refactoring, or asking about code quality.
Generate an ARCHITECTURE.md file for a codebase following matklad's principles. Use when asked to "write an architecture doc", "create ARCHITECTURE.md", "document the architecture", "explain the codebase structure", "write a codemap", or when onboarding contributors to a project. Based on https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/06/ARCHITECTURE.md.html and modeled after rust-analyzer's architecture doc.
Constructive critique through 5 HackerNews commenter personas with evidence-based claim validation. Use when user wants devil's advocacy, stress testing, or critical review of ideas, docs, architecture, or code. Use for "roast", "critique this", "poke holes", "devil's advocate", "stress test", or "what's wrong with". Do NOT use for code review (use systematic-code-review), implementation changes, or performance profiling without a specific critique request.
Design Azure infrastructure using natural language, or analyze existing Azure resources to auto-generate architecture diagrams, refine them through conversation, and deploy with Bicep. When to use this skill: - "Create X on Azure", "Set up a RAG architecture" (new design) - "Analyze my current Azure infrastructure", "Draw a diagram for rg-xxx" (existing analysis) - "Foundry is slow", "I want to reduce costs", "Strengthen security" (natural language modification) - Azure resource deployment, Bicep template generation, IaC code generation - Microsoft Foundry, AI Search, OpenAI, Fabric, ADLS Gen2, Databricks, and all Azure services
Expert knowledge for Azure Route Server development including troubleshooting, best practices, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, and configuration. Use when designing hub-spoke or multi-region topologies, BGP peering with NVAs/on-prem, tuning routing policies, or fixing route propagation issues, and other Azure Route Server related development tasks. Not for Azure Virtual Network (use azure-virtual-network), Azure Virtual Network Manager (use azure-virtual-network-manager), Azure Virtual WAN (use azure-virtual-wan), Azure VPN Gateway (use azure-vpn-gateway).
Reviews codebases, architectures, PRs, and technical plans for vanity engineering — code and systems built for the developer's ego, resume, or intellectual pleasure rather than delivering user or business value. Triggers on: "review this code", "is this over-engineered", "code review", "architecture review", "complexity audit", "vanity check", "is this necessary", "simplify this", "tech debt review", or any request to evaluate whether code or architecture is justified by actual requirements. Also trigger when the user shares a codebase and asks for feedback, when discussing framework/library choices, when reviewing PRs, or when someone is debating whether to refactor or rebuild. Nudge activation when you detect patterns of unnecessary abstraction, premature optimization, or resume-driven technology choices in code the user shares — even if they haven't asked for a vanity review.
Analyze Java project architecture at macro level - package structure, module boundaries, dependency direction, and layering. Use when user asks "review architecture", "check structure", "package organization", or when evaluating if a codebase follows clean architecture principles.