Loading...
Loading...
Found 24 Skills
This skill should be used when the user asks to review, proofread, check, or evaluate content. It provides comprehensive text review (grammar, logic, compliance) and version evaluation (A/B testing, comparison analysis). Text review automatically adds AI disclaimer at the end.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze skill quality", "evaluate this skill", "review skill quality", "check my skill", or "generate quality report". Evaluates local skills across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity.
Checklist covering accuracy, style, accessibility, and localization requirements for documentation releases.
Assess documentation quality across readability, consistency, audience fit, and prose clarity. Produces a scored review with actionable findings. This skill should be used before releases, during doc reviews, or when documentation feels unclear or inconsistent.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "apply skill improvements", "update skill from plan", "execute improvement plan", "fix skill issues", "implement skill recommendations", or mentions applying improvements from quality review reports. Reads improvement-plan-{name}.md files generated by skill-quality-reviewer and intelligently merges and executes the suggested changes to improve Claude Skills quality.
Unified codebase quality review: merge readiness verdict + maintainability (Clean Code) + docs-vs-code consistency. Use for code review, quality check, refactor check, outdated docs check, or merge/production readiness.
Execute development tasks with skeleton-first approach and layered TDD. Includes optional adversarial verification (code quality + test completeness review). Use when users start working on a task (T-XX), need development guidance, or implement features/bugfixes. Triggers on keywords like "execute task", "start T-XX", "implement", "develop", "开发任务", "执行任务", "对抗式验证", "--review".
Review implementation quality — catch visual bugs, placeholder text, broken links, and spec drift that functional tests miss. Use this after tests pass to ensure the output looks right, not just works right.
Use when reviewing a plan before implementation begins. Not for autonomous plan analysis — use plan-review agent instead. Challenges scope, walks through architecture/quality/tests/performance interactively with mandatory user checkpoints and opinionated recommendations.
Reviews chapter quality with checker agents and generates reports. Use when the user asks for a chapter review or runs /webnovel-review.
Review changed code for reuse opportunities, quality issues, and inefficiencies using three parallel review agents, then fix any issues found. Triggers when the user says "simplify", "clean up the code", "review the changes", or after run-plan execution when code quality verification is needed.
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.