Loading...
Loading...
Found 107 Skills
Creative problem-solving techniques for breaking through stuck points - includes collision-zone thinking, inversion, pattern recognition, and simplification
Apply systematic problem-solving methodologies to complex challenges. Use when the user says "guide me through structured problem solving" or "I want to crack this challenge with guided problem solving techniques"
Systematic problem-solving techniques — inversion, collision-zone, scale-game, simplification cascades.
Systematic problem-solving techniques for stuck-ness. Techniques: simplification cascade (complexity spirals), collision-zone thinking (innovation blocks), meta-pattern recognition (recurring issues), inversion exercise (assumption constraints), scale game (uncertainty). Actions: simplify, analyze, recognize patterns, invert assumptions, scale thinking. Keywords: problem solving, complexity spiral, innovation block, stuck, simplification, meta-pattern, assumption inversion, scale uncertainty, breakthrough thinking, root cause, systematic analysis, Microsoft Amplifier, debugging approach, creative solution. Use when: complexity spiraling, hitting innovation blocks, seeing recurring patterns, constrained by assumptions, uncertain about scale, generally stuck on problems.
Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for marketing challenges including campaign complexity (simplification cascades), creative blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring campaign patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), audience scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from proven problem-solving frameworks adapted for marketing execution.
Forces exhaustive problem-solving using corporate PUA rhetoric and structured debugging methodology. MUST trigger when: (1) any task has failed 2+ times or you're stuck in a loop tweaking the same approach; (2) you're about to say 'I cannot', suggest the user do something manually, or blame the environment without verifying; (3) you catch yourself being passive — not searching, not reading source, not verifying, just waiting for instructions; (4) user expresses frustration in ANY form: 'try harder', 'stop giving up', 'figure it out', 'why isn't this working', 'again???', '换个方法', '为什么还不行', '你再试试', '加油', '你怎么又失败了', or any similar sentiment even if phrased differently. Also trigger when facing complex multi-step debugging, environment issues, config problems, or deployment failures where giving up early is tempting. Applies to ALL task types: code, config, research, writing, deployment, infrastructure, API integration. Do NOT trigger on first-attempt failures or when a known fix is already executing successfully.
Practical application guide for HUMMBL's 6 transformations (Perspective, Inversion, Composition, Decomposition, Recursion, Meta-Systems). Includes when to use each transformation, combination patterns, analysis templates, output formats, real-world examples, and common pitfalls. Essential for applying mental models effectively in problem-solving and analysis.
Claude Shannon's Six Techniques for Creative Problem Transformation. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Simplifier, Analogist, Reframer, Decomposer, Inverter — who each apply one of Shannon's problem-solving techniques to your stuck problem. The lead synthesizes into a transformation assessment: which reframings opened paths, which analogies map, and the honest Shannon verdict on whether the problem has been cracked open. Use when stuck on any problem — engineering, strategy, design, math, business. Works standalone or after other analysis skills surface a hard sub-problem.
OODA loop decision framework (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act). Use for complex decisions, problem-solving, unclear situations, or when someone is jumping to solutions without analysis.
Apply structured problem-solving using MECE principle, issue trees, hypothesis-driven approach, and the Pyramid Principle. Use this skill when the user faces a complex, ambiguous problem and needs to decompose it systematically, structure a consulting-style analysis, or organize recommendations clearly — even if they say 'where do I start', 'this problem is too big', 'help me break this down', or 'structure my thinking'.
Apply pragmatist philosophy (Peirce, James, Dewey) to frame knowledge as instrumental for action, evaluate ideas by their practical consequences, and conduct inquiry as problem-solving. Use this skill when the user needs to bridge theory and practice, evaluate competing theories by their usefulness, employ abductive reasoning to generate hypotheses, or when they ask 'which theory is more useful here', 'how do I move from abstract ideas to actionable knowledge', or 'what practical difference does this distinction make'.
Research ideation partner. Generate hypotheses, explore interdisciplinary connections, challenge assumptions, develop methodologies, identify research gaps, for creative scientific problem-solving.