Loading...
Loading...
Found 27 Skills
Use when the user says "/plan-review", "plan review", or "PRD review" and provides a plan file path that needs critical review and iterative refinement with Codex.
Auto-assembles review panel using deterministic rules, dispatches agents against plan file, collects verdicts.
Inline adversarial plan review — 3 sequential checks (Feasibility, Completeness, Scope & Alignment) performed by the calling LLM in its own context. No subagents spawned. Call after saving a plan. Returns GATE_PASS or GATE_FAIL with blocking issues.
CEO/Founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Adapted from gstack/plan-ceo-review (Garry Tan, MIT license).
[Planning] Self-review plan for validity, correctness, and best practices
Carmack-level plan review via RepoPrompt or Codex. Use when reviewing Flow epic specs or design docs. Triggers on /flow-next:plan-review.
Debate implementation plans between Claude Code and Codex CLI. After Claude Code creates a plan, invoke this skill to have Codex review it. Both AIs debate through multiple rounds until reaching full consensus before implementation begins.
Use when another skill or agent needs a review panel assembled, retained, or converged — invoked by /review-loop, /plan-review, and code-reviewer, not directly by users.
Use when reviewing a plan before implementation begins. Not for autonomous plan analysis — use plan-review agent instead. Challenges scope, walks through architecture/quality/tests/performance interactively with mandatory user checkpoints and opinionated recommendations.
End-to-end orchestration for non-trivial software feature development. Use this skill whenever the user asks to implement a PR-sized feature, break down a plan, have subagents review a plan, run a plan-review-development-acceptance loop, coordinate multiple review perspectives, produce an acceptance report, or generate an HTML PR summary. Prefer this skill for multi-step code changes even if the user only says "build this feature" and the task is not a tiny one-file edit.
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
Use when the user asks to run Gemini CLI for code review, plan review, or big context (>200k) processing. Ideal for comprehensive analysis requiring large context windows. Uses Gemini 3 Pro by default for state-of-the-art reasoning and coding.