Loading...
Loading...
Found 34 Skills
Performance review and testing: evaluate Core Web Vitals, page load times, bundle sizes, runtime performance, resource optimization, and rendering efficiency with browser-based measurement and benchmarking.
Periodic sales performance review composite. Aggregates ALL sales initiatives taken in a given period — outbound campaigns, inbound efforts, events, partnerships, content, referrals — and measures the impact of each on pipeline and revenue. Produces a team-presentable report covering initiative-level performance, cross-initiative comparisons, pipeline attribution, what's working, what's not, and where to invest next. Tool-agnostic — pulls data from any combination of CRM, outreach tools, and tracking systems.
Structure a performance review with self-assessment, manager template, and calibration prep. Use when review season kicks off and you need a self-assessment template, writing a manager review for a direct report, prepping rating distributions and promotion cases for calibration, or turning vague feedback into specific behavioral examples.
Reflect, Evaluate, Fine-tune, Learn, Evolve, Correct, Transform — nightly automated performance review
Reviews Elixir code for performance issues including GenServer bottlenecks, memory usage, and concurrency patterns. Use when reviewing high-throughput code or investigating performance issues.
Detect performance anti-patterns and apply optimization techniques in Go. Covers allocations, string handling, slice/map preallocation, sync.Pool, benchmarking, and profiling with pprof. Use when checking performance, finding slow code, reducing allocations, profiling, or reviewing hot paths. Trigger examples: "check performance", "find slow code", "reduce allocations", "benchmark this", "profile", "optimize Go code". Do NOT use for concurrency correctness (use go-concurrency-review) or general code style (use go-coding-standards).
WordPress performance code review and optimization analysis. Use when reviewing WordPress PHP code for performance issues, auditing themes/plugins for scalability, optimizing WP_Query, analyzing caching strategies, checking code before launch, or detecting anti-patterns, or when user mentions "performance review", "optimization audit", "slow WordPress", "slow queries", "high-traffic", "scale WordPress", "code review", "timeout", "500 error", "out of memory", or "site won't load". Detects anti-patterns in database queries, hooks, object caching, AJAX, and template loading.
Guides engineering managers through the specific challenges of managing top engineers — produces a four-quadrant ability/confidence diagnostic, the Rock Star vs. Superstar distinction, common mistakes to avoid, a stagnation diagnostic (Diminishing XP), and a Pusher vs. Puller framework for managing burnout and team friction. Use when the user says "rockstar engineer," "superstar," "high performer," "brilliant jerk," "wants promotion," "hardest to manage," "overconfident," "my best developer is burning out," "engineer is frustrated," or "my best developer is pushing me." Do NOT use for standard underperformance (use performance-reviews) or general motivation questions (use engineer-motivation).
Helps engineering managers support direct report growth — produces a stage-by-stage model of engineering impact (Circles of Influence), a framework for non-linear career planning (Tarzan Method), diagnostic signals for stalled growth, conversation scripts for career talks, and a promotion readiness vs. timing distinction. Use when the user says "career growth," "promotion," "career path," "this person wants to grow," "career conversation," "what's next for this person," "career ladder," "IC vs manager track," "how do I help my report advance," "help someone grow," or "engineer wants a promotion." Do NOT use for formal written performance reviews or underperformance — use performance-reviews instead.
Go testing patterns for production-grade code: subtests, test helpers, fixtures, golden files, httptest, testcontainers, property-based testing, and fuzz testing. Covers mocking strategies, test isolation, coverage analysis, and test design philosophy. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, reviewing test quality, setting up test infrastructure, or choosing a testing approach. Trigger examples: "add tests", "improve coverage", "write tests for this", "test helpers", "mock this dependency", "integration test", "fuzz test". Do NOT use for performance benchmarking methodology (use go-performance-review), security testing (use go-security-audit), or table-driven test patterns specifically (use go-test-table-driven).
Go coding standards and style conventions grounded in Effective Go, Go Code Review Comments, and production-proven idioms. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, enforcing naming conventions, import ordering, variable declarations, struct initialization, or formatting rules. Trigger examples: "check Go style", "fix formatting", "review naming", "Go conventions". Do NOT use for architecture decisions, concurrency patterns, or performance tuning — use go-architecture-review, go-concurrency-review, or go-performance-review instead.
Helps engineering managers measure and improve team delivery — produces a history of why common metrics fail, the DORA four-key-metrics framework (deployment frequency, lead time, change failure rate, MTTR), DevEx's three dimensions (feedback loops, cognitive load, flow state), a translation layer from engineering metrics to business outcomes, and a list of measurement anti-patterns to avoid. Use when the user says "how do I measure productivity," "DORA metrics," "velocity," "cycle time," "developer experience," "DevEx," "how do I show our team is performing well," "metrics for engineering," "team is slow," "engineering performance," or "connect engineering to business." Do NOT use for managing an underperforming individual — use performance-reviews instead.