Loading...
Loading...
Found 42 Skills
Detects code smells in PHP codebases. Identifies God Class, Feature Envy, Data Clumps, Long Parameter List, Long Method, Primitive Obsession, Message Chains, Inappropriate Intimacy. Generates actionable reports with refactoring recommendations.
Principal-engineer-level React refactoring patterns for eliminating code smells. Covers prop drilling, state explosion, component composition, abstraction quality, coupling, hooks, rendering patterns, and testability. Use when refactoring existing React codebases, reviewing PRs for architectural issues, or identifying technical debt in React applications.
Detect common code smells and anti-patterns providing feedback on quality issues a senior developer would catch during review. Use when user opens/views code files, asks for code review or quality assessment, mentions code quality/refactoring/improvements, when files contain code smell patterns, or during code review discussions.
Identifies anti-patterns specific to amplihack philosophy. Use when reviewing code for quality issues or refactoring. Detects: over-abstraction, complex inheritance, large functions (>50 lines), tight coupling, missing __all__ exports. Provides specific fixes and explanations for each smell.
Detects code smells and anti-patterns — long methods, large classes, feature envy, data clumps, primitive obsession, dead code, magic numbers, deep nesting, and more. Uses configurable thresholds from .codeprobe-config.json when available. Trigger phrases: "code smells", "smell check", "anti-patterns", "clean code review".
Detect code smells including long methods, large classes, duplicated code, and deep nesting. Use when identifying code quality issues or planning refactoring.
Detect patterns, anomalies, and trends in code and data. Use when identifying code smells, finding security vulnerabilities, or discovering recurring patterns. Handles regex patterns, AST analysis, and statistical anomaly detection.
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
Identifies code smells and provides step-by-step refactoring recipes. Use when improving legacy code maintainability or teaching students how to apply Clean Code and SOLID principles.
Use when the user needs code quality review, refactoring guidance, SOLID principles application, or help identifying and fixing code smells. Triggers: code smell detection, refactoring planning, naming convention review, complexity reduction, DRY analysis, error handling improvement.
Systematic code refactoring while preserving all external behavior. Use when identifying code smells, planning refactoring sequences, executing safe structural improvements, or validating behavior preservation. Includes code smell catalog (reference.md) and refactoring execution protocol.
Use when reviewing code for anti-patterns. Keywords: anti-pattern, common mistake, pitfall, code smell, bad practice, code review, is this an anti-pattern, better way to do this, common mistake to avoid, why is this bad, idiomatic way, beginner mistake, fighting borrow checker, clone everywhere, unwrap in production, should I refactor, 反模式, 常见错误, 代码异味, 最佳实践, 地道写法