Loading...
Loading...
Found 52 Skills
A disciplined diagnostic loop for tricky bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → Minimize → Hypothesize → Instrument → Fix → Regression-test. Use this when the user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, states that something is broken/throwing errors/failing, or describes a performance regression.
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.
Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.
UI test recipe -- composes browser-record (capture) + browser-replay (verify) so every test produces a replayable RVF artifact, not an ephemeral run
[BETA] Dogfood the active branch end-to-end as a QA engineer. Diffs the branch against main, builds an exhaustive browser test matrix of every change (full user journeys, not just features), drives the app with agent-browser, then auto-fixes issues, adds regression tests, and commits each fix until the matrix is green. Use when you want a hands-off 'test everything we just built and make it actually work' pass before shipping.
Generate comprehensive test plans, test cases, regression test suites, automation annotations, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation. Use when planning QA before execution, documenting test strategies, marking which flows require E2E follow-up, or creating structured bug reports. Do not use for executing tests against a live repository or running verification gates — use qa-execution for that.
Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles
Automate QA regression testing with reusable test skills. Create login flows, dashboard checks, user creation, and other common test scenarios that run consistently.
Performs manual testing of Story AC via executable bash scripts saved to tests/manual/. Creates reusable test suites per Story. Worker for ln-510.
Use when writing or reviewing tests for Python behavior, contracts, async lifecycles, or reliability paths. Also use when tests are flaky, coupled to implementation details, missing regression coverage, slow to run, or when unclear what tests a change needs.