Loading...
Loading...
Found 15 Skills
Automated code review workflow using OpenAI Codex CLI. Implements iterative fix-and-review cycles until code passes validation or reaches iteration limit. Use when building features requiring automated code validation, security checks, or quality assurance through Codex CLI.
Run OpenAI's Codex CLI agent in non-interactive mode using `codex exec`. Use when delegating coding tasks to Codex, running Codex in scripts/automation, or when needing a second agent to work on a task in parallel.
Get OpenAI Codex documentation pages in Markdown. Use when you need to reference Codex CLI features, configuration options, or any other Codex functionality.
Diagnose GitHub bug reports in openai/codex. Use when given a GitHub issue URL from openai/codex and asked to decide next steps such as verifying against the repo, requesting more info, or explaining why it is not a bug; follow any additional user-provided instructions.
Run a GitHub issue digest for openai/codex by feature-area labels, all areas, and configurable time windows. Use when asked to summarize recent Codex bug reports or enhancement requests, especially for owner-specific labels such as tui, exec, app, or similar areas.
Patterns and anti-patterns for using OpenAI Codex Goals — the persistent objectives feature introduced in Codex 0.128.0. Use this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or debugging a `/goal` invocation, deciding whether a task should be a Goal at all, drafting a research Goal that needs an evidence ledger, or diagnosing a Goal that completed against the wrong surface. Triggers on `/goal`, "Codex Goal", "Codex goals", "persistent objective", "evidence-based completion", "iteration policy", "blocked stop condition", or any user message describing a multi-turn Codex task with a defined finish line. Trigger even if the user doesn't explicitly mention Goals — if they're typing "/goal" or asking Codex to "keep going until X", this skill applies.
Expert in Oh My Codex (OMX) - workflow layer for OpenAI Codex CLI with agents, skills, and team coordination
Cross-platform Electron desktop app for OpenAI Codex with build and development workflows
Delegate coding to OpenAI Codex CLI (features, PRs).
Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Codex while staying the reviewer. Prefer it over a one-shot Codex forwarder (such as the codex-rescue agent) specifically when the user will review the resulting diff and commit it themselves, or wants the full brief → dispatch → review → commit loop across a single task or a queue. Also reach for it proactively for a separate implementation pass on a bounded, well-specified task (an implementation sweep, a migration, a mechanical refactor, parallel work). Covers writing the Codex brief, dispatching it via the bundled relay.mjs helper, waiting for completion, reviewing the result, and committing. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
Enables Claude Code to collaborate with OpenAI Codex CLI on Windows. Use this skill when the user wants to get a second opinion from Codex, compare approaches between Claude and Codex, or leverage both AI assistants for collaborative problem-solving. This skill supports both non-interactive mode (automatic response retrieval) and interactive mode (visual pane splitting with tmux).
Run an independent code review using the OpenAI Codex CLI in headless mode. Gets a second opinion from a different model family (GPT-5/o3) on recent changes, a PR, a commit, or the whole app — covering bugs, regressions, security, data consistency, UX/state bugs, performance risks, and testing gaps. Saves a severity-prioritised report to .jez/reviews/. Triggers: 'codex review', 'review with codex', 'second opinion on this code', 'independent code review', 'what does codex think', 'get codex to review'.