Loading...
Loading...
Found 19 Skills
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze skill quality", "evaluate this skill", "review skill quality", "check my skill", or "generate quality report". Evaluates local skills across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity.
Diagnoses and fixes skills in the dotnet/skills repository that lose to their own baseline, fail to activate, time out, or return "no credible improvement". Use when an evaluation verdict is a regression or underpowered, when a skill regressed after a change, when /evaluate reports no results, or when deciding whether a weak skill should be strengthened or retired. Do not use for scaffolding a brand-new skill (use create-skill) or a brand-new eval (use create-skill-test).
Use skill if you are testing a skill's instructional quality by following its workflow literally on a real task, documenting friction points, and fixing ambiguities.
Aggregate generated maintainer reports into a skill-quality summary. Use when reviewing docs, link, and eval health. NOT for editing report sources.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "apply skill improvements", "update skill from plan", "execute improvement plan", "fix skill issues", "implement skill recommendations", or mentions applying improvements from quality review reports. Reads improvement-plan-{name}.md files generated by skill-quality-reviewer and intelligently merges and executes the suggested changes to improve Claude Skills quality.
Evaluate a skill against the Legal Skill Design Framework — thirteen design parameters (including trust-surface, freshness, schema validation, and conflict detection), three legal failure modes, and a three-band verdict (Ready / Some Concern / Material Concerns). Use when deciding whether to trust a community skill before installing it, before deploying a first-party skill to your team, or whenever the user asks "should I trust this?" or "is this skill well-designed?". Runs automatically as part of /legal-builder-hub:skill-installer.
Review skills in any project using a dual-axis method: (1) deterministic code-based checks (structure, scripts, tests, execution safety) and (2) LLM deep review findings. Use when you need reproducible quality scoring for `skills/*/SKILL.md`, want to gate merges with a score threshold (for example 90+), or need concrete improvement items for low-scoring skills. Works across projects via --project-root.
Audit installed skills across project, global, and plugin levels. Lists skills with line counts, identifies improvement opportunities (conciseness, clarity, overlap, token waste). Use when reviewing skill quality, finding bloated skills, or optimizing token budgets.
Orchestrates complete skill lifecycle from creation to optimization. Use for comprehensive skill development, reviewing skills, or managing skill quality.
Validate Claude Code skills against the agentskills specification. Catches structural, semantic, and naming issues before users do.
Evaluates agent skills against Anthropic's best practices. Use when asked to review, evaluate, assess, or audit a skill for quality. Analyzes SKILL.md structure, naming conventions, description quality, content organization, and identifies anti-patterns. Produces actionable improvement recommendations.
Guide to effective Claude Code skill authoring using TDD methodology and persuasion principles. Use when creating new skills, improving compliance, or validating quality before deployment. Do not use for evaluating existing skills (use skills-eval) or analyzing architecture (use modular-skills). Follow the Iron Law: write a failing test before writing any skill.