Loading...
Loading...
Found 31 Skills
Critical review of Intent design quality. Checks for over-engineering, YAGNI violations, premature abstraction, and simplification opportunities. Uses interactive discussion to refine design decisions.
KISS, DRY, YAGNI principles for simple, maintainable code
Audit code for over-engineering, premature optimization, and cognitive complexity. Identifies unnecessary abstractions, YAGNI violations, and overly complex solutions. Read-only analysis. Triggers: review simplicity, over-engineering, complexity check, YAGNI.
Audit and annotate an AI-generated implementation plan for requirements traceability, YAGNI compliance, and assumption risks. Use when reviewing, validating, or auditing an implementation plan or design proposal produced by an AI agent.
Use when designing solutions, adding features, or refactoring by applying KISS, YAGNI, and Principle of Least Astonishment to write simple, predictable code.
Final review pass to ensure code is as simple and minimal as possible. Use after implementation is complete to identify YAGNI violations and simplification opportunities.
Plan Plus — Brainstorming-Enhanced PDCA Planning. Combines intent discovery from brainstorming methodology with bkit PDCA's structured planning. Produces higher-quality Plan documents by exploring user intent, comparing alternatives, and applying YAGNI review before document generation. Use proactively when user mentions planning with brainstorming, intent discovery, exploring alternatives, or wants a more thorough planning process. Triggers: plan-plus, plan plus, brainstorming plan, enhanced plan, deep plan, 플랜 플러스, 브레인스토밍, 기획, 의도 탐색, 대안 탐색, プランプラス, ブレインストーミング, 企画, 意図探索, 计划加强, 头脑风暴, 深度规划, 意图探索, plan mejorado, lluvia de ideas, planificación profunda, plan amélioré, remue-méninges, planification approfondie, erweiterter Plan, Brainstorming, vertiefte Planung, piano migliorato, brainstorming, pianificazione approfondita Do NOT use for: simple tasks that don't need planning, code-only changes.
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
Use this agent when you need a final review pass to ensure code changes are as simple and minimal as possible. This agent should be invoked after implementation is complete but before finalizing changes, to identify opportunities for simplification, remove unnecessary complexity, and ensure adherence to YAGNI principles. Examples: <example>Context: The user has just implemented a new feature and wants to ensure it's as simple as possible. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system" assistant: "Great! Let me review the implementation for simplicity and minimalism using the code-simplicity-reviewer agent" <commentary>Since implementation is complete, use the code-simplicity-reviewer agent to identify simplification opportunities.</commentary></example> <example>Context: The user has written complex business logic and wants to simplify it. user: "I think this order processing logic might be overly complex" assistant: "I'll use the code-simplicity-reviewer agent to analyze the complexity...
Audit code architecture for over-engineering and unnecessary abstractions. Use when user asks to "review architecture", "simplify code structure", "reduce over-engineering", "evaluate abstractions", or mentions premature abstraction, interface proliferation, factory patterns, YAGNI, or enterprise-grade complexity.
Core development principles and standards for consistent, high-quality code. Automatically applies DRY, KISS, YAGNI, SOLID, TDD, and micro-commit methodologies.
Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for object-oriented design quality — including applying SOLID, DRY, and YAGNI principles, improving class and interface design, fixing OOP concept misuse (encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism), identifying and resolving code smells (God Class, Feature Envy, Data Clumps), or improving object creation patterns, method design, and exception handling. Part of the skills-for-java project