Loading...
Loading...
Found 17 Skills
Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.
Systematically review AI agent work for quality, accuracy, and completeness. Catches bugs, verifies patterns, checks against requirements, and suggests improvements before committing changes.
Verifies that git commits address security audit findings without introducing bugs. This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify these commits fix the audit findings", "check if TOB-XXX was addressed", "review the fix branch", "validate remediation commits", "did these changes address the security report", "post-audit remediation review", "compare fix commits to audit report", or when reviewing commits against security audit reports.
Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.
Information about the differential fuzzer tool, how to run it and use it catch bugs in Turso. Always load this skill when running this tool
Perform comprehensive, deep analysis of a system and its subsystems to identify bugs, race conditions, stale documentation, dead code, and correctness issues. Use when asked to "audit this system", "exhaustive analysis of X", "analyze for correctness", "root out issues in...", "deep dive into...", "verify this code is correct", "find bugs in...", or when reviewing agent-written code for production readiness. Automatically decomposes systems into subsystems, applies appropriate analysis checklists, and produces structured findings with severity classification.
Code review skill for analyzing code quality, detecting bugs, and ensuring best practices. Provides comprehensive code review with actionable feedback. Use proactively when user requests code review, quality check, or bug detection. Triggers: code review, review code, check code, analyze code, bug detection, 코드 리뷰, 코드 검토, 버그 검사, コードレビュー, バグ検出, 代码审查, 代码检查, revisión de código, revisar código, detección de errores, revue de code, réviser le code, détection de bugs, Code-Review, Code überprüfen, Fehlererkennung, revisione del codice, rivedere codice, rilevamento bug Do NOT use for: design document creation, deployment tasks, or gap analysis (use phase-8-review).
Deep line-by-line code review that finds all bugs, logic errors, redundancies, and issues. Traces call stacks, fixes everything, verifies 100%. Use when reviewing features, PRs, code changes, or auditing for bugs.
Reviews pull requests and code diffs for concrete bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance. Use when asked to review a PR, branch diff, or pre-merge changes. Reports only high-confidence, actionable issues.
Re-reads code you just wrote with fresh perspective to catch bugs, errors, and issues. Use after completing a feature, fixing a bug, or any code changes. Triggers on "review my code", "fresh eyes", "check for bugs", "did I miss anything", or "sanity check".
Run Ultimate Bug Scanner for automated bug detection across multiple languages. Detects 1000+ bug patterns including null pointers, security vulnerabilities, async/await issues, and resource leaks. Integrates with quality-gate workflow.
This skill should be used when performing a code review on local changes on the current branch compared to the main branch. It uses multiple parallel agents to check for bugs, CLAUDE.md compliance, git history context, previous PR comments, and code comment adherence, then scores and filters findings by confidence level.