Loading...
Loading...
Found 122 Skills
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
Applies and explains code conventions across TypeScript, React, C#, and Markdown. Enforces naming rules, file naming patterns, TSDoc and XML doc standards, inline comment intent (the *why*, not the *what*), code structure, error handling, async patterns, and dead code policy. Also enforces ADR and contributor doc decisions, and flags decisions that appear stale or misaligned with current tooling. USE FOR: convention questions, code review against project standards, applying naming rules, auditing intent comments, checking TSDoc completeness, enforcing recorded ADR decisions, and flagging stale architectural decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: security vulnerability scanning, performance profiling, runtime debugging, or generating net-new code without a review target.
Use when designing new system architecture, reviewing existing designs, or making architectural decisions. Invoke for system design, architecture review, design patterns, ADRs, scalability planning.
Use this skill when documenting significant architectural decisions. Provides ADR templates following the Nygard format with sections for context, decision, consequences, and alternatives. Use when writing ADRs, recording decisions, or evaluating options.
System architecture and technical design specialist. 🚨 TIER 2 SKILL - ON-DEMAND ACTIVATION 🚨 Use when user requests involve: - System architecture design and planning - Technical specifications and ADRs - Technology evaluation and selection - Scalability and performance planning - Integration architecture and API design - English: "design system", "architecture", "ADR", "tech stack", "scalability" - Swedish: "arkitektur", "systemdesign", "teknikval", "skalbarhet" Architecture Specialist (British female voice) provides: - System design and architecture patterns - Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) - Technology evaluation and trade-off analysis - Cloud and microservices architecture - Integration patterns and API design User confirmation optional but recommended for major architectural decisions.
Capture architectural decisions made during Claude Code sessions as structured ADRs. Auto-detects decision moments, records context, alternatives considered, and rationale. Maintains an ADR log so future developers understand why the codebase is shaped the way it is.
Write Architectural Decision Records following MADR template. Applies Definition of Done criteria, marks gaps for later completion. Use when generating ADR documents from extracted decisions.
Extract architectural decisions from conversations. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off discussions, and explicit choices. Use when analyzing session transcripts for ADR generation.
Systematically evaluate architecture decisions, document trade-offs, and select appropriate patterns. This skill should be used when the user asks about 'architecture decision', 'ADR', 'design pattern selection', 'technology choice', or needs to evaluate architectural trade-offs. Keywords: architecture, ADR, patterns, trade-offs, technical debt, quality attributes, decision record.
ASCII architecture diagrams for ADRs via graph-easy. TRIGGERS - ADR diagram, architecture diagram, ASCII diagram.
System architecture guidance for Python/React full-stack projects. Use during the design phase when making architectural decisions — component boundaries, service layer design, data flow patterns, database schema planning, and technology trade-off analysis. Covers FastAPI layer architecture (Routes/Services/Repositories/Models), React component hierarchy, state management, and cross-cutting concerns (auth, errors, logging). Produces architecture documents and ADRs. Does NOT cover implementation (use python-backend-expert or react-frontend-expert) or API contract design (use api-design-patterns).
System architecture design for Rust/WebAssembly projects. Creates ADRs, designs APIs, plans module structures, and documents architectural decisions. Never writes implementation code - focuses purely on design and documentation.